On 2011-10-10, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
> Hi Kyle and Aaron,
>
> let me answer to you by making in Cc the tor-talk mailing lists where
> there is an on-going discussion about it.
>
> It has been suggested that FireGPG is unsafe
> (https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/), your ap
On 10/10/11 6:44 PM, Kyle L. Huff wrote:
> Another, more narrow approach would be to enforce within the plug-in
> that the URL of the page that the plug-in is embedded on must match the
> extension path. For example, the plug-in could detect if it was loaded
> on a page with the URL containing
> "c
Hi Kyle and Aaron,
let me answer to you by making in Cc the tor-talk mailing lists where
there is an on-going discussion about it.
It has been suggested that FireGPG is unsafe
(https://tails.boum.org/bugs/FireGPG_may_be_unsafe/), your approach by
design sounds very nice.
I am wondering whether i
