Tagging this for the apt/noble and apt/oracular uploads.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Chan
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080216
Title:
sshd cannot bind to IPv4 interfaces
Status
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080499
Title:
/usr/share/apport/apport:ProcessLookupError:
@aaronmfeld If you have an upgrade issue, please file a separate issue,
this particular one has been verified as fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078720
Ti
How does it calculate that? The package is Priority: required for the
source in debian/control, which extends to Package: apt and accidentally
I suppose to Package: apt-utils as well
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
Upgrading with ubuntu-release-upgrader from proposed also worked
correctly:
$ lxc list -c nft
+--+--+-+
| NAME | BASE IMAGE | TYPE |
+--+--+-+
| jammy-to-noble-p
Verifying the apt/jammy SRU:
I installed libapt-pkg6.0=2.4.13 from proposed, then run `do-release-
upgrade -p` (`-d` should work now too, but was broken before):
The headers for the running kernel are not being removed:
Remove (was auto installed) binutils binutils-common
binutils-x86-64-linu
@sil2100 The regression in time is back to the old behavior prior to
24.04.20; actually it's a bit faster as there is just a single action
group now. But the reason for it was that we iterated over all packages
in the cache and recorded their selected state in case we needed to undo
a change (verif
** Description changed:
(For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04 vi
This is the expected behavior, it will pick the highest version (well
highest priority version) from any allowed repository. You have not
disallowed installing the Ubuntu one, and you also did not allow it to
install the Mozilla one.
You have two options
1) Pin the Ubuntu version down instead:
I
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2079810
Title:
unattended-upgrades d
** Description changed:
+ (For APT SRU versioning, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
+
[Impact]
Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
-
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04
ubuntu-release-upgrader SRU uploaded to noble and also uploaded to
oracular.
These reintroduce the slow path as a fallback, specifically for APT
versions prior to this SRU (and hence mantic); they also fix that code
to correctly consider running kernels (and KeepInstalledSection) in the
removal of
apt/jammy SRU uploaded. The ones for noble and devel need a bit more
massaging due to test suite failures but are not relevant before
oracular is released (noble's apt is used for noble->oracular updates)
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affe
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Obsolete packages can be removed despite still having reverse dependencies
installed, for example:
+
+
Now that 24.04.1 has been released, 22.04 users are encouraged to upgrade to
24.04 via the `do-release-upgrade` command. This issue was seen whilst test
Turns out that yes this is a bug in the APT solver:
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/373/diffs
It was not restoring/keeping obsolete (in its parlance, no longer
downloadable) packages that are marked for removal due to a false
optimization.
--
You received this bug notific
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078720
Title:
Upgrading from jammy to noble results i
During configuration of python3,
/usr/share/python3/debpython/files.py fails to get the content of
packages-
error running python rtupdate hook rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/py3clean", line 210, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/py3clean",
Tagging for discussion, but this may be the right behavior, to install
systemd-resolved.
Please run
ubuntu-bug 2078555
to attach relevant information
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug n
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => network-manager
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078676
Title:
wifi not remembering
Dual signing started back then but it finished in July and the default
key exposed was switched to the newest for August.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
3. APT, when checking the InRelease file, trusts it (and it could only
become trusted with the strong key signature, the only it knows), but
also sees a second signature with a week algorithm. Emits a warning.
So, I only see a false warning for the user: the system is safe using
the stronger key,
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => python-httplib2
(Ubuntu)
** Changed in: python-httplib2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: python-httplib2 (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-httplib2 (Ubuntu Jammy)
I
we should just blocklist apport from trying to analyse teamviewer
crashes.
** Changed in: icu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: rls-nn-notfixing
** Tags removed: rls-nn-notfixing
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
pam_lastlog.so doesn't exist anymore. Suggest consulting the journal for
logins, or maybe wtmpdb is an alternative with libpam-wtmpdb?
** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: rls-nn-notfixing
--
You received this bug notific
If we can reproduce this with our icudata in some process we should work
around it in icudata perhaps, but it doesn't seem worth expending effort
on this for third-party binaries.
** Also affects: icu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification beca
This is a weird thing, new dh-python seemingly just removed running the
test instead of switching to python -m unittest discover which would
have been arguably the right fix?
** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer affects: dh-python (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076655
Title:
[FFe] APT 3.0 solver updates in August
Status in apt
Going to close this invalid as there's clearly a broken disk and it's
failing to hash an mmaped file, hence the mmap()ed regions SIGBUSes when
the read fails.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
The Pro client is responsible for setting the credentials, that said
this may be the correct behavior, it may also depend on the umask of
your root user.
As in, it makes sense to protect the credentials from non-root users,
you don't want e.g. some daemon to gain access to it and leak it.
** Pack
Update verified.
root@55d22e9f8666:/# apt update
Hit:1 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports noble InRelease
Get:2 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports noble-updates InRelease [126 kB]
Hit:3 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports noble-proposed InRelease
Get:4 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports nob
This is a time_t transition issue most likely, the symbols files was not
updated for 64-bit time_t, and hence all the time_t symbols will now
depend on the build version on armhf.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
St
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04.1 => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073126
Title:
More nuanced public key algorithm revocat
** Description changed:
[Impact]
If you have Source Code enabled, and you change the pockets configuration to
"all pockets", it will add -backports without source code. The Source Code flag
will still be set in the UI, but after a reload, you can see it is in a mixed
state.
This is mor
I have adjusted the test plan to say to diffoscope them, and run another
diffoscope vs the software-properties-qt 0.99.48.1 and the packages are
still the same, timestamps, versions and the obvious /usr/share/doc
deduplication difference aside (as expected), so I am marking this as
verified.
** De
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077162
Title:
[FFe
The software-properties-qt regressions are still the bugs in autopkgtest
by having a separate software-properties-qt package in the release
pocket, which wrongly gets triggered and then fails to download, this
package will be superseded again by this
--
You received this bug notification because
The software-properties-qt regressions are still the bugs in autopkgtest
by having a separate software-properties-qt package in the release
pocket, which wrongly gets triggered and then fails to download, this
package will be superseded again by this
--
You received this bug notification because
** Description changed:
[Impact]
We want to provide an easy tool to allow users to refresh signing keys. This
feature works for both deb822 sources and classic sources.
[Test plan]
- For all releases:
+ For all releases (using the default sources.list format, i.e. adding the
+ PPA usi
apt-daily-upgrade.service has no Before= ordering constraints, hence it
can't hold up the boot; the blame analysis is pretty much irrelevant -
yes it starts at boot but that doesn't mean it needs to finish before
you can login.
The question I have then is why run-snapd-ns-chromium.mnt.mount only
s
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also
** Description changed:
[Impact]
We want to provide an easy tool to allow users to refresh signing keys. This
feature works for both deb822 sources and classic sources.
[Test plan]
For all releases:
1. Add a weak PPA, ensure its key is refreshed.
2. Add a weak private PPA and
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- We want to provide an easy tool to allow users to refresh signing keys. This
feature works for deb822 sources, classic sources are TBD.
+ We want to provide an easy tool to allow users to refresh signing keys. This
feature works for both deb822 sources and cl
Please consult https://code.launchpad.net/~juliank/software-
properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/471412 for the code changes.
I have not implemented any support for trusted.gpg.d so far.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
We want to provide an easy tool to allow users to refresh signing keys. This
feature works for deb822 sources, classic sources are TBD.
[Test plan]
We have multiple test cases:
1. Add a weak PPA, ensure its key is refreshed.
2. Add a weak private PPA and ensure th
** Description changed:
(This is uploaded to noble as 2.8.1 per
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
[Impact]
We have received feedback from users that use NIST-P256 keys for their
repositories that are upset about receiving a warning. APT 2.8.0 in
noble-proposed would bump the warning
** Description changed:
⚠️ Only land this in the release/updates pocket after PPAs have been
resigned
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release, save
This should be fixed now, PPAs are signed with 4096 bit keys, existing
1024 ones have been dual signed now and the end point gives you 4096 bit
keys if you add them.
** Changed in: launchpad
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
** Summary changed:
- [FFe] APT 24.04 crypto policy update
+ APT 24.04 crypto policy update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055193
Title:
APT 24.04 crypto pol
** Description changed:
- I'm asking for a blanket FFe for the experimental 3.0 solver that can be
- used with the --solver 3.0 argument. It's mostly really bug fixing
- that's happening, I'm not sure what would constitute a feature at this
- point*, but the changes are still fairly big as I'm ref
Public bug reported:
I'm asking for a blanket FFe for the experimental 3.0 solver that can be
used with the --solver 3.0 argument. It's mostly really bug fixing
that's happening, I'm not sure what would constitute a feature at this
point*, but the changes are still fairly big as I'm refactoring it
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2036467
Title:
Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum
mis
** Description changed:
⚠️ Only land this in the release/updates pocket after PPAs have been
resigned
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release, save
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075968
Title:
cannot login after upgrade from xubuntu 22.04 to
** Description changed:
+ (This is uploaded to noble as 2.8.1 per
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AptUpdates)
+
[Impact]
We have received feedback from users that use NIST-P256 keys for their
repositories that are upset about receiving a warning. APT 2.8.0 in
noble-proposed would bump the warning
** Description changed:
[Impact]
We have received feedback from users that use NIST-P256 keys for their
repositories that are upset about receiving a warning. APT 2.8.0 in
noble-proposed would bump the warning to an error, breaking them.
We also revoked additional ECC curves, which may
** Description changed:
⚠️ Only land this in the release/updates pocket after PPAs have been
resigned
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release, safe
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: regression-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073126
Title:
More
The same caveat applies to -updates, but there is a question of whether
we should ship 2.8.0 as this or make 2.8.0 different, I did not push a
tag for it yet.
i.e. given that this is a stable release update that will break PPAs
users currently have warnings for, it might make sense to make it brea
** Description changed:
- ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned
+ ⚠️ Only land this in the release/updates pocket after PPAs have been
+ resigned
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development serie
Fix committed in ubuntu/main
** Summary changed:
- Package wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble
+ systemd-resolved wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble
** No longer affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committe
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
libraries become marked as manually installed after transitioning to t64
package names as we forgot to transition the automatically installed bit.
Before:
root@m:~# apt-mark showmanual
base-files
bash
bsdutils
cloud-init
dash
diffutils
eatmydata
findutils
grep
gzip
** Description changed:
- I just do-release-upgraded from Jammy to Noble on a pretty minimal
- server.
+ [Impact]
+ Upgrades from jammy to noble sometimes end up without systemd-resolved being
installed, breaking networking as the system already migrated to resolved in
jammy and now it disappear
I don't recommend running with pcscd, it's much more stable to run with
direct access, but I do not know why it doesn't seem to work for you, it
certainly does for me.
It failing with pcscd is nice, it not telling us why and how to fix it
is bad UX though.
** Changed in: gnupg2 (Ubuntu)
St
Yeah sorry folks this was a bit awkward, to avoid respinning other
images we temporarily spun out software-properties-qt into its own
package (0.99.48.1) and fixed it there, and hence there was no bug
closure or anything. This will fold back into the main package in a
zero-day SRU in 0.99.49.
** A
I'm unsubscribing as I only did a no-change rebuild. I'd generally
advise against using LC_ALL=C in any setting however, it's generally a
bad idea and you should use LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 instead.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is su
The last comment made me realize we are talking about the Qt frontend
here, and yes, sure, we only ever implemented deb822 for the Gtk
frontend and the Dbus backend.
The Qt frontend needs to gain a deb822 entry editor dialog, possibly
some rendering fixes for deb822 source entries, and swap on deb
Public bug reported:
APT is currently overriden from required to important, this is causing
it not to be installed by default when bootstrapping with mmdebstrap.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators (ubuntu-archive)
Stat
Please attach a tarball of your /etc/apt/sources.list and
/etc/apt/sources.list.d
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-propertie
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Tags added: block-proposed block-proposed-noble
** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble
** Description changed:
+ ⚠️ Only land this in the release pocket after PPAs have been resigned
+
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the developm
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2060578 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060578
This was fixed in u-r-u in bug 2060578
** No longer affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subsc
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491
Title:
Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup
Status in X2Go
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04
** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060581
Title:
stop shipping debian-installer package hook
Status in apport package in Ubun
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he time
Sponsored, thanks
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059550
Title:
autopkgtest failures on 1:5.0.
** Description changed:
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release)
(This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble
release, as
Public bug reported:
(This bumps the apt version to 2.8.0. APT uses the odd/even number
system, with 2.7.x being the development series for 2.8, and this is the
only change left for the 2.8 release)
(This will be uploaded after the beta and may be released before noble
release, as a zero day SRU
Thanks for the bug report, unfortunately this has become quite
convoluted and I've identified at least 3 different strands of
discussion in here that are not related.
Some stuff, like "runuser" in a cron job is clearly never going to work,
but I don't know how the other two instances - sessions wi
Geekley I personally agree and would go a lot further and hide even most
dependencies (you don't really care which libraries you are installing,
just about choices made, e.g. if there's an a | b dependency it should
tell you that it picked a).
So if you want to think about it that terse mode would
You may have heard about the xz-utils backdoor, compromised binaries
have been removed and replaced with older ones, and a partial amd64
rebuild is ongoing.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
Uploaded procps with the file; leaving gamemode task open because maybe
dynamic enhancements there still make some sense in 24.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
I'm agreeing with desktop in following Fedora to bump to 1048576, the
precedence makes this safe, and this I consider this a bug fix for
crashing software and not a feature request.
** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Con
Subscribing Canonical desktop team to get their input.
Basically the ask is to ship this file:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/blob/f39/f/10-map-count.conf
I believe if we do it should be shipped in procps; or possibly, gamemode
should set that option?
** Also affects: procps (Ubuntu
jammy is green too now
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
jammy is green too now
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to a
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228
Title:
software-prop
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have
passed so this is verified there.
Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy-
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic
--
You received this bug notification beca
The regressions on mantic have cleared up and the tests of apt have
passed so this is verified there.
Still clearing out a regression from update-manager:i386 on jammy-
** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done-mantic
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054716
Title:
package polkitd 124-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed polkitd
package
If it gets stuck maybe look at top to see if it spends CPU anywhere do
do a ps faux or something to see the process tree. I wonder if it's a
debconf frontend socket being stuck or something
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because
The comment one is fixed in noble, I'm not sure what Xavier's
ubuntu.sources is about though, there's probably subtle errors in there
that get lost in the comment. So...
Suffice it to say, this is a rather niche issue as 23.10 did not
actually ship with ubuntu.sources, so it affects a few people w
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047447
Title:
No valid source.list found while upg
Sorry Łukasz, this has landed in 2.7.13 in proposed back in February,
with the caveat that it is a warning for now. This will essentially
close the bug and we should probably consider the FFe to be switching
that to an error once everything landed. Arguably some consider any of
that work a bug fix
While the patch makes the application run it also breaks the
functionality it's patching for deb822 sources by just ignoring them.
More work is needed and I do have it scheduled for this pulse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2053228 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228
Please do not delete files, certainly not ubuntu.sources, or you will no
longer get updates.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nettle in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885646
Title:
RM ring FTBFS
Status in nettle package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in ring
I mean that's good to know that systemd does not load system-wide
environment variables but it's their design choice and not a bug in apt
(or systemd).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bug
Apologies, I saw the same issue locally fixed it but must have forgotten
to build a new .dsc:/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054925
Title:
Debootstrap
1 - 100 of 1375 matches
Mail list logo
