Re: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments

2005-05-29 Thread ttxpress
myth (there is no basis for this comment outside of subjectivity in terms of a priori, radical philosophical dualism' : (e.g.) 'i, individually, not as part of any school of thought oppose you for the sole reason that my reading of reality is totally correct while and you can't grasp its ab

Re: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments

2005-05-29 Thread knpraise
  -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]com>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]innglory.orgSent: Sun, 29 May 2005 05:24:16 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments I am totally different from you JD in many areas; in fact at times I think the onl

Re: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments

2005-05-27 Thread David Miller
John wrote: > These problems -- did they include Deegan > and his use of the word "liar?" Yes. Peace be with you. David Miller. -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.

Re: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments

2005-05-27 Thread knpraise
These problems  -- did they include Deegan and his use of the word "liar?"    -Original Message-From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:48:53 -0400Subject: [TruthTalk] Ad hominem arguments Izzy wrote: >> Calling DM “nuts” is an ad ho

RE: [TruthTalk] ad hominem arguments

2004-12-22 Thread Slade Henson
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller Sent: Tuesday, 21 December, 2004 11.24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [TruthTalk] ad hominem arguments This is why we have a moderator. Ideally, we want the moderator to be the only one to address t