apply FEC repair mechanisms.
> So that’s why we need some ways like MDI, easy to calculate and be
> implemented in the network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Rachel
> &
; like routers, to implement them, e.g., post-repair metrics, which will need
> the devices to have the ability to decode and apply FEC repair mechanisms.
> So that’s why we need some ways like MDI, easy to calculate and be
> implemented in the network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy.
>
>
> > BR,
> >
> > Rachel
> >
> >
> >
> > 发件人: tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Ali C. Begen
> > 发送时间: 2017年7月17日 19:31
> > 收件人: Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com>
> > 抄送: tsv-area@ietf.org
> > 主题: Re: 答复: Proposal for
: 2017年7月17日 20:17
收件人: Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.hu...@huawei.com>
抄送: Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com>; tsv-area@ietf.org
主题: Re: 答复: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis
Well, I believe you wanna come up with some metrics for streaming video over
http and want t
network without having to be a RTP entity or TCP proxy.
>
>
>
> BR,
>
> Rachel
>
>
>
> *发件人:* tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *Ali C. Begen
> *发送时间:* 2017年7月17日 19:31
> *收件人:* Qin Wu <bill...@huawei.com>
> *抄送:* tsv-area@ietf.org
> *主题
AnyOffice
发件人: Ali C. Begen
收件人: Qin Wu;
抄送: tsv-area@ietf.org; 郑辉;
主题: Re: Proposal for revising RFC4445 or make RFC4445bis
时间: 2017-07-17 13:02:07
I am really curious about who is using MDI anymore. Can you share data if you
have it? RTCP XR is still extensively used and for non-RTP, it is a mixed
I am really curious about who is using MDI anymore. Can you share data if
you have it? RTCP XR is still extensively used and for non-RTP, it is a
mixed of several things.
-acbegen
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Qin Wu wrote:
> Hi, All:
>
> We like to get a sense of this