Re: SPI reorg (was: Re: [Discussion] Tuscany kernel modulization

Hi, I have shared a recent experience in this regard with comments inline. Thanks - Venkat On 4/20/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/29/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3/27/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One reason the SPI module is so l

Re: Represent the recursive composition in runtime

Hi Raymond, Thanks for bringing this up. I did get a feel of this during a recent addition that I did for supporting configuration of properties for components implemented by a composite. I was probably at loss to lay out an illustration as well as you have done :). 1) I guess the 'includes' t

Re: Using Tuscany in a webapp, was: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it

On 4/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core functions, > other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a > Domain > concept, I also want to contribute around havin