hink there is one wire, no multiplicity violation.
-Table 2, row4, ok, but I think you will need a unique name for
each binding.sca.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: Normalize t
Comments inline.
Simon
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Comments inline.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
As captured at
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/multiple-bindings-and-reference-multiplicity.html,
a reference can use "target" attribute or binding uri to declare the
outbound endpoints. M
Comments inline.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
As captured at
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/multiple-bindings-and-reference-multiplicity.html,
a reference can use "target" attribute or binding uri to declare the
outbound endpoints. Multiplicity and promotion complicate the picture
even more
On 7/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
As captured at
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/multiple-bindings-and-reference-multiplicity.html,
a
reference can use "target" attribute or binding uri to declare the
outbound
endpoints. Multiplicity and promotion complicate the pictu
Hi,
As captured at
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANYWIKI/multiple-bindings-and-reference-multiplicity.html, a
reference can use "target" attribute or binding uri to declare the outbound
endpoints. Multiplicity and promotion complicate the picture even more.
I suggest that we internally (for ex
