Kent Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Alan Harris-Reid
wrote:
Hi,
I have a SQLite cursor which I want to traverse more than once, eg...
for row in MyCursor:
method1(row)
then later...
for row in MyCursor:
method2(row)
Method2 is never run, I guess because the pointer is
Thank you, yes I still have xp. I heard alot of bad things about vista.
Then my parents bought a new computer and they I saw why. Anyway, I'm going
to atleast wait till the first service pack come out for Windows 7. Though
I am going to upgrade to xp pro.
A dollar you said? Hmm.. I might hav
I uploaded a file. I know it's not very impressive.
Kent Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:19 PM, ssiverling wrote:
>
>> So I have been working on this example for a little while. I looked for
>> the
>> answer before posting. I tried to use two raw inputs, then use
>> sys.stdo
Greetings,
Thank you all for you help. I appreciate your help. Anyway, I thought I
was answer something.
"Dunno where you got that from. "
It was from the book on assembly I was reading.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Variable%3A-From-input-and-output-tp27457364p
"ssiverling" wrote
thing I was reading is that alot of the tutorials assume prior
programming
I just checked and Amazon have the Soul of CP/M still available second
hand for less than a dollar!
Gotta be a bargain!
OH, yes, If you want a free PC assembler you can use DOS debug.
Its still th
"ssiverling" wrote
So I want to learn assembly. However, it can take a experienced C
programmer a year to learn assembly.
Dunno where you got that from.
An experienced C programmer should pick up assembler in a few days.
C is just "portable assembler" It is almost a textual replacement for
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:19 PM, ssiverling wrote:
> So I have been working on this example for a little while. I looked for the
> answer before posting. I tried to use two raw inputs, then use
> sys.stdout.write, to add them together. However I think I might need to use
> a variable. Any help
> If you want value % 100/10 to give the same result in Python 2.6 and
> Python 3 you can use value % 100//10 which will always use integer
> division.
>
Kent, thanks for anticipating this. I actually was struggling to
figure out how to update the division and wasn't certain how.
Below is the ful
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:19 PM, ssiverling wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> So I want to learn assembly. However, it can take a experienced C
> programmer a year to learn assembly. With me it might take longer. One
> thing I was reading is that alot of the tutorials assume prior programming
> experi
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
>> Perhaps the code on activestate is not a correct copy of what you are
>> running? The conditional at line 23 extends all the way to line 35 -
>> the end of the function - so if value % 100/10 == 1 no more code is
>> executed and None is ret
Greetings,
So I want to learn assembly. However, it can take a experienced C
programmer a year to learn assembly. With me it might take longer. One
thing I was reading is that alot of the tutorials assume prior programming
experience. So I figure I would go with an easier language. So I look
> It now works ok but..
>
> You should not use ord as variable as ord() is used by python already.
>
> Also this will fail in python 3 and 2 with import from future, it does
> division differently.
from __future__ import division
11 % 100 / 10
> 1.1001
>
> So "if value % 100/1
On do, 2010-02-04 at 13:30 -0500, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
> Could you all indulge me one last time and tell me if the above
> version works for you? If so, I'll update the recipe to spare others a
> similar headache.
It now works ok but..
You should not use ord as variable as ord() is used by pyth
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
>
> Geez -- I think I found the (now-obvious) mistake. If you compare the
> above to the ActiveState recipe, it's obvious that I forgot to copy
> over the final, outer "else:" clause.
>
> Could you all indulge me one last time and tell me if
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
>> Perhaps the code on activestate is not a correct copy of what you are
>> running? The conditional at line 23 extends all the way to line 35 -
>> the end of the function - so if value % 100/10 == 1 no more code is
>> executed and None is ret
> Perhaps the code on activestate is not a correct copy of what you are
> running? The conditional at line 23 extends all the way to line 35 -
> the end of the function - so if value % 100/10 == 1 no more code is
> executed and None is returned.
>
Here is the code that I'm running locally (hopeful
On Do, 2010-02-04 at 16:11 +, Owain Clarke wrote:
> Thanks for your input. I had discounted the idea of a dictionary
> because all the keys need to be unique, so whether the key is the
> English or non-English word, it couldn't cope with for example "too",
> or a similar word in the other lang
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Alan Harris-Reid
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a SQLite cursor which I want to traverse more than once, eg...
> for row in MyCursor:
> method1(row)
> then later...
> for row in MyCursor:
> method2(row)
> Method2 is never run, I guess because the pointer is at the b
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Kent Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
>> Here's the link to the recipe:
>>
>> http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576888/
>
> Perhaps the code on activestate is not a correct copy of what you are
> running? The conditional a
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
> I just noticed, however, that in the comments section of the
> ActiveState recipe that someone is getting incorrect results for
> certain numbers (11 and 12, specifically).
>
> But when I use the code on my own machine it still works fine.
> Hi,
> ?
> A dictionary (associative array of keys and values) seems a good
> datatype to use. vocab = {} vocab[frenchword]?= englishword
> ?
...
> Cheers!!
> Albert-Jan
Sure, a dict is the obvious choice. For saving into file, if the app is
to be used internally, you can even print it in
> No time to search for the issue, but here are some trials (hole from 10 -->
> 19):
> for i in range(21):
> print "%s\t: %s" %(i,ordinal(i))
> for i in (-1,22,33,99,100,101,199,200,999,1000):
> print "%s\t: %s" %(i,ordinal(i))
> ==>
> 0 : 0th
> 1 : 1st
> 2 : 2nd
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Owain Clarke wrote:
> My question is, that if I proceed like this I will end up with a single list
> of potentially several hundred strings of the form "frword:engword". In
> terms of performance, is this a reasonable way to do it, or will the program
> increasingl
"Serdar Tumgoren" wrote
was hoping that you all could help me "crowdsource" the issue. If you
have the time and inclination, could you look at the code and tell me
if and where I've gone wrong?
Not sure about the reported bugs but some comments:
What happens if
if value % 100/10 <> 1is fal
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:11:33 +
Owain Clarke wrote:
> But if one word has different meanings in the other language, you may need to
> use a list of words as the values.
?
You can have a more sophisticated structure for you dict. For instance, "love"
is both a noun and a verb, and each has
Hi,
I have a SQLite cursor which I want to traverse more than once, eg...
for row in MyCursor:
method1(row)
then later...
for row in MyCursor:
method2(row)
Method2 is never run, I guess because the pointer is at the bottom of
the row 'stack' after the first 'for' loop
How can I mo
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I just noticed, however, that in the comments section of the
> ActiveState recipe that someone is getting incorrect results for
> certain numbers (11 and 12, specifically).
>
> But when I use the code on my own machine it sti
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:11:24 -0500
Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> A few months back I posted my first (and only) "recipe" to
> ActiveState. It was just a little function to convert an integer or
> its string representation to an ordinal value: 1 to 1st, 2 to 2nd,
> etc.
>
> Not sure if t
"Owain Clarke" wrote
I had discounted the idea of a dictionary because all the keys need to be
unique,
Thats true but the values can be lists and do not need to be unique.
Its probably a better starting point that search through a list looking at
every item.
so whether the key is the Engl
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:11:33 +
Owain Clarke wrote:
> But if one word has different meanings in the other language, you may need to
> use a list of words as the values.
?
You can have a more sophisticated structure for you dict. For instance, "love"
is both a noun and a verb, and each has
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:39:29 -0800 (PST)
Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A dictionary (associative array of keys and values) seems a good datatype to
> use.
> vocab = {}
> vocab[frenchword] = englishword
>
> For instance:
> >>> vocab = {"aimer": "love"}
> >>> vocab
> {'aimer': 'love'}
> >>
Hi folks,
A few months back I posted my first (and only) "recipe" to
ActiveState. It was just a little function to convert an integer or
its string representation to an ordinal value: 1 to 1st, 2 to 2nd,
etc.
Not sure if this really qualifies as a recipe, per se, but it was a
handy little functio
Thanks for your input. I had discounted the idea of a dictionary
because all the keys need to be unique, so whether the key is the
English or non-English word, it couldn't cope with for example "too",
or a similar word in the other language.
Owain
Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
Hi,
A dictionary (associative array of keys and values) seems a good datatype to
use.
vocab = {}
vocab[frenchword] = englishword
For instance:
>>> vocab = {"aimer": "love"}
>>> vocab
{'aimer': 'love'}
>>> vocab["parler"] = "speak"
>>> vocab
{'aimer': 'love', 'parler': 'speak'}
>>> for engword,
Hello, all.
I am a newcomer to Python, and I know that I have much learning to do
before I implement my idea, but I am working on the beginnings of a
vocabulary building program. This is how I am catching new words at the
moment.
def newVocab(x,y):
"""
Add new word pair, English word second.
35 matches
Mail list logo
