On 19/04/12 15:47, Max S. wrote:
Could anyone tell me why I should use a .pyc file rather than a .py?
You don't, python handles that for you.
They only come into effect on import statement. When Python imports the
module it will use the pyc if available (and more recent that the .py).
Don't t
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:57 -0400, Max S. wrote:
> Then if I understand correctly, I work with .py files and (should) run
> them as .pyc files?
No, you always run the py files, don't worry about the pyc files at all,
the PVM will do what it does.
--
Russel.
==
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:47 -0400, Max S. wrote:
> Could anyone tell me why I should use a .pyc file rather than a .py? After
> doing some research, I have found that a .py file is first precompiled and
> then run, while a .pyc file is already precompiled and is simply run. But
> unless I'm mista
Then if I understand correctly, I work with .py files and (should) run them
as .pyc files?
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:47 -0400, Max S. wrote:
> > Could anyone tell me why I should use a .pyc file rather than a .py?
> After
> > doing some res
Could anyone tell me why I should use a .pyc file rather than a .py? After
doing some research, I have found that a .py file is first precompiled and
then run, while a .pyc file is already precompiled and is simply run. But
unless I'm mistaken, it seems that a .pyc is no faster or better than a .