Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S3C6400/SMDK6400: fix stack_setup in start.S

Fix stack_setup to place the stack on the correct address in DRAM accroding to U-Boot standard and remove conditional compilation by CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE macro that is not necessry. This macro was introduced and used only by this board for some unclear reason. The definition of this macro is a

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fix flash_sect_erase() to display correct message

flash_sect_erase() displays message "Erased #N sectors" even when there are some protected sectors found and command "erase" fail. Signed-off-by: Seunghyeon Rhee --- common/cmd_flash.c |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_flash.c b/common/cmd_fl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix flash_sect_erase() to display correct message

Dear Wolfgang Denk, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear =?UTF-8?B?7J207Iq57ZiE?=, > > In message you > wrote: > >> flash_sect_erase() displays message "Erased #N sectors" even when >> there are some protected sectors found and command "erase" fail. >> >> Signed-off-by: Seunghyeon Rhee >> --- >> com

[U-Boot] [PATCH] samsung: fix DMC1_MEM_CFG for s3c64xx

The MSB of DMC1_MEM_CFG can be set to '1' for separate CKE control for S3C6400. In the configuration of SMDK6400, however, two 16-bit mDDR (SAMSUNG K4X51163) chips are used in parallel to form 32-bit memory bus and there is no need to contorl CKE for each chip separately. AFAIK, CKE1 is not at all

[U-Boot] Please check if the patch for SMSC LAN9220 is missing

There were two patches submitted to add support for SMSC LAN9220 and LAN9221. The latter (more recent one) has been applied but the former hasn't yet. Refer to the following and check please. Regards, Seunghyeon Rhee Thu Apr 23 07:36:25 CEST 2009 > Daniel Mack wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mac

[U-Boot] [PATCH] S3C6400/SMDK6400: fix stack_setup in start.S

stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in README and the related CONFIG_* macro definitions. This makes macro CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE no longer necessry. This was introduced and used only by this board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S3C6400/SMDK6400: fix stack_setup in start.S

Dear Minkyu Kang, 2009/11/2 Minkyu Kang : > Dear Seunghyeon Rhee > > 2009/10/31 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" : >> stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in >> DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NET: Fix MAC addr handling for smc911x

This patch turns off MAC address mismatch warning when optional eeprom programmed with MAC address is not available. In that case, smc911x's MAC address register has its default value ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff and it's not a valid address. This makes eth_initialize() show the warning which has no meani

[U-Boot] [PATCH] samsung: move DRAM parameters

Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description (s3c6400.h) to board description (smdk6400.h). DRAM parameters are rather board-specific than SoC specific. According to the current source, one may have to change the definitions in s3c6400.h in addition to creating the new board descrip

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] samsung: move DRAM parameters

r LPM Technology Inc. T +82-70-8255-6007 F +82-2-6442-6462 M +82-10-2790-0657 Minkyu Kang 쓴 글: > Dear Seunghyeon Rhee, > > 2009/11/4 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" : > >> Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description >> (s3c6400.h) to board descriptio