Feladó: Dragan
Simic Dátum: 2023 november 29 22:34:25Tárgy: Re: [PATCH
1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán
Benjamin On 2023-11-29 22:12, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote: > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/main Ah, I already used the same
mailing list sys
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/main Eredeti levél Feladó:
Dragan Simic Dátum: 2023 november 29 05:47:55Tárgy: Re:
[PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán
Benjamin On 2023-11-29 00:35, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote: > Sorry i can not
://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/main Eredeti levél Feladó:
Hugo Villeneuve Dátum: 2023 november 29 00:17:51Tárgy: Re:
[PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán
Benjamin On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:26:08 + (GMT) Szőke
Kálmán Benjamin wrote: > It was absolut
there was no
any significats new features for boards since their initial commits.
Eredeti levél Feladó: Fabio Estevam Dátum: 2023
november 27 21:39:19Tárgy: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card
boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin On Mon, Nov
27, 2023 at 4:55 PM
november 27 01:44:16Tárgy: Re: [PATCH 1/1]
pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
Hi Benjamin, On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 8:17 PM Szőke
Kálmán Benjamin wrote: > > It can happen when will
-Wall be enabled as in others SW projects. My patches are final,
an be a co-author.
Eredeti levél Feladó: Fabio Estevam Dátum: 2023
november 20 01:18:24Tárgy: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card
boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin On Sun, Nov
19, 2023 at 8:47 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote: > >
It will warn, if warni
pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
Hi Benjamin, [Please do not top-post] On Sun, Nov 19,
2023 at 6:08 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote: >
(void)(devno); is need because devno arguments is an unused variable, need to
use this solution to suppress
Hi,All previouse stage/patches was a "blind alley" solution because finally i
found, many code parts are ready from freesacle sources. So needed to refactor
the full codes, which seems now a totally new code/solution for it.So, I don't
see the point in describing them in a changelog, useless to
Other pico SoMs still has board_phy_config() also, you should remove it from
them, too.pico-imx8mq:
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/board/technexion/pico-imx8mq/pico-imx8mq.c#L111pico-imx6ul:
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/blob/master/board/technexion/pico-imx6ul/pico-imx6ul.c#L1
rt for 2GB
memory SoMsCímzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin Hi Benjamin,
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 8:22 AM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote: > > Original code was a nested if statement for checking 1g() and 2g().
>
https://github.com/TechNexion/u-boot-tn-imx/blob/tn-imx_v2021.04_5.10.72_2.2.0-stab
Original code was a nested if statement for checking 1g() and
2g().https://github.com/TechNexion/u-boot-tn-imx/blob/tn-imx_v2021.04_5.10.72_2.2.0-stable/board/technexion/pico-imx7d/pico-imx7d_spl.c#L106Do
you have any information about the PCB layout of the different i.MX7 pico SoM
revisions?Que
I will not keep, most of Technexion SoM codes are broken or limited in
functionalities (like 2GB RAM support missing, dual boot missing), because
there is no any active maintenancing and as i see nobody cares about it from
freescale community.What is the point of renaming and rewriting these cod
To use fsl_esdhc_initialize() is must or esdhc drivers object will be not
initialized. It was made by Technexion.In practice, it turned out that 3 is
good.
Technexion did that renaming, it is better to keep in
synchronized.https://github.com/TechNexion/u-boot-tn-imx/tree/tn-imx_v2021.04_5.10.72_2.2.0-stable/board/technexion/pico-imx7d
All codes come from official u-boot codes from Technexion may they knows better
why it is optimal in this
form.https://github.com/TechNexion/u-boot-tn-imx/tree/tn-imx_v2021.04_5.10.72_2.2.0-stable/board/technexion/pico-imx7d
You can see a history about this pico-imx7d boot impruving on the follwoing
GitHub issue and pull-request.
https://github.com/TechNexion/u-boot-tn-imx/issues/6My current pull-request is
syncronized with u-boot mainline at u-boot-fslc. You can see the logical
changes much more in it. But i can n
16 matches
Mail list logo