Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:01 PM Wolfgang Wallner
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> -"Simon Glass" schrieb: -----
> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] acpi: device: Fix check for sequence number
> >
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 a
Hi Simon,
-"Simon Glass" schrieb: -
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] acpi: device: Fix check for sequence number
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 01:23, Wolfgang Wallner
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > -----"Simon Glass"
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 01:23, Wolfgang Wallner
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> -"Simon Glass" schrieb: -----
> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH] acpi: device: Fix check for sequence number
> >
> > Hi Wolfgang,
> >
> > On Th
Hi Simon,
-"Simon Glass" schrieb: -
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] acpi: device: Fix check for sequence number
>
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 06:47, Wolfgang Wallner
> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the function acpi_check_seq() checks wh
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 06:47, Wolfgang Wallner
wrote:
>
> Currently the function acpi_check_seq() checks whether dev->req_seq is
> unequal to "-1", but it should actually check dev->seq. Change it to
> check dev->seq.
>
> For req_seq the value "-1" would be a valid (meaning 'any'),
Currently the function acpi_check_seq() checks whether dev->req_seq is
unequal to "-1", but it should actually check dev->seq. Change it to
check dev->seq.
For req_seq the value "-1" would be a valid (meaning 'any'), while for
seq the value "-1" means 'none' and is not valid.
Quoting the
6 matches
Mail list logo