Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same.
Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to
customize one of these differently, so it's useful to allow them to be
different.
Fix this to use
(ping Jagan)
On 06/06/2018 10:51 AM, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 06/06/2018 07:58 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
[snip as the thread is getting long]
On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Mart
> On 01.06.2018, at 02:59, Martin Kelly wrote:
>
> Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
> the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same.
> Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to
> customize one of these differently, so
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
> Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
> the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same.
> Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to
> customize one of these differ
On 05/31/2018 07:45 PM, klaus.go...@theobroma-systems.com wrote:
On 01.06.2018, at 02:59, Martin Kelly wrote:
Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same.
Although this is typically the case, sometimes
On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same.
Although this is typically the case, sometimes you mig
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
> On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > > Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes
> > > the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetr
[snip as the thread is getting long]
On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
I can see the issues with new defconfigs, but I'm not sure if it will really
be that bad. If we apply thi
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
> [snip as the thread is getting long]
>
> On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
> > > On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >
> > > I can see the issu
On 06/06/2018 07:58 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
[snip as the thread is getting long]
On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote:
On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrot
10 matches
Mail list logo