Hi Vipin,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:46:31 +0530, Vipin Kumar vipin.ku...@st.com
wrote:
My first feeling is that the descriptors are allocated as Normal
Cachabale memory and it would not help to access them using readl/writel
...
And no, we don't need to allocate them non-cacheable,
On 1/23/2013 12:25 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Vipin,
My first feeling is that the descriptors are allocated as Normal
Cachabale memory and it would not help to access them using readl/writel
Should the desciptors be allocated as non-cachable memory. If yes then
how to do that in u-boot
I
Hi Vipin,
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:46:31 +0530, Vipin Kumar vipin.ku...@st.com
wrote:
On 1/23/2013 12:25 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Vipin,
My first feeling is that the descriptors are allocated as Normal
Cachabale memory and it would not help to access them using readl/writel
Should
Signed-off-by: Frank Dols frank.d...@synopsys.com
---
drivers/net/designware.c | 108 +++---
drivers/net/designware.h |4 +-
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/designware.c b/drivers/net/designware.c
index
Provide a short patch title and a longer description in the patch
itself. that would be much more readable
On 1/22/2013 7:40 PM, Frank Dols wrote:
Signed-off-by: Frank Dolsfrank.d...@synopsys.com
---
drivers/net/designware.c | 108 +++---
Hi Vipin,
My first feeling is that the descriptors are allocated as Normal
Cachabale memory and it would not help to access them using readl/writel
Should the desciptors be allocated as non-cachable memory. If yes then
how to do that in u-boot
I suppose the rest of the code would be
6 matches
Mail list logo