Hi Sughosh,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 11:56:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > > > I have netbsd running on hawkboard, but i do not boot it using the
> > > > bootm command, but use the go command instead. I will try to build a
> > > >
hi,
On Wed Jul 10, 2013 at 11:56:30PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > I have netbsd running on hawkboard, but i do not boot it using the
> > > bootm command, but use the go command instead. I will try to build a
> > > netbsd image with the u-boot header and give it a try with bootm. Need
> > > a
Hi,
On Jul 10, 2013 11:04 PM, "Sughosh Ganu" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> > hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can
write
> > some
> > > > sa
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> hi Tom,
>
> On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write
> some
> > > sandbox tests for the other image types today and post my results. I
> guess
>
[snip]
I will tidy up my tests and submit these also at some point. Coverage now
> includes FIT and legacy images, with bootm commands and subcommands. For
> the record there is still a lot of test code missing:
>
(sorry, sent the last email by mistake - here is a list that I compiled
when writin
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On
Hi Sughosh,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> hi Tom,
>
> On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write
> some
> > > sandbox tests for the other image types today and post my results
hi Tom,
On Tue Jul 09, 2013 at 05:19:32PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Yes, I am not really comfortable with this. I will see if I can write some
> > sandbox tests for the other image types today and post my results. I guess
> > this bootm code has built up over a long time and it is hard to know
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > On T
>> Important, but I really want to see real-world booting in a case or two.
>> Unfortunately I don't have any ARM boards that work out of the box with
>> NetBSD.
>
> There 'seems' to be a pre-built freebsd arm port...
>
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/BeagleBone
NM.. they are using the 'boo
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> > > Hi Tom,
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:04:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 08,
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:
Hi Tom,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Sim
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rin
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:00:00PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 10:22:13AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > >> In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage w
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:17:10AM -0500, Robert Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
> >> command. This causes unpredictable beha
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>> In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
>> command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
>>
>> The use of a local variable means that the reset of cmd_boo
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:26:11PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
> command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
>
> The use of a local variable means that the reset of cmd_bootm.c does not
> in fact use the same image structure,
In the recent bootm refactor, the PREP stage was missing in the bootz
command. This causes unpredictable behaviour.
The use of a local variable means that the reset of cmd_bootm.c does not
in fact use the same image structure, so remove this.
Also manually set the OS type to Linux, since this is
21 matches
Mail list logo
