On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:37:41PM -0500, Derald Woods wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Derald D. Woods
> wrote:
>
> > On 05/01/2016 08:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:12:28PM -0500, Derald D. Woods wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04/28/2016
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Derald D. Woods
wrote:
> On 05/01/2016 08:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:12:28PM -0500, Derald D. Woods wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/28/2016 06:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:55:17PM -0500,
On 05/01/2016 08:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:12:28PM -0500, Derald D. Woods wrote:
On 04/28/2016 06:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:55:17PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
I am hoping to look at this tomorrow at work. Any suggested toolchain you
recommend?
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 07:12:28PM -0500, Derald D. Woods wrote:
> On 04/28/2016 06:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:55:17PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> >
> >>I am hoping to look at this tomorrow at work. Any suggested toolchain you
> >>recommend?
> >gcc-4.9.x fails (too large),
On 04/28/2016 06:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:55:17PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
I am hoping to look at this tomorrow at work. Any suggested toolchain you
recommend?
gcc-4.9.x fails (too large), gcc-5.3.x succeeds, gcc-6.x is also likely
fine but I haven't started using
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> While the OMAP3 has 64KiB of SRAM, per the TRM the download area is only
> from 0x4020 to 0x4020F000 and exceeding that will cause failure to
> boot. Further, we need to make sure that we don't run into
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:55:17PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> I am hoping to look at this tomorrow at work. Any suggested toolchain you
> recommend?
gcc-4.9.x fails (too large), gcc-5.3.x succeeds, gcc-6.x is also likely
fine but I haven't started using those SDKs I just made today.
--
Tom
I am hoping to look at this tomorrow at work. Any suggested toolchain you
recommend?
On Apr 28, 2016 5:45 PM, "Tom Rini" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:46:36PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > While the OMAP3 has 64KiB of SRAM, per the TRM the download area is only
> > from
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:46:36PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> While the OMAP3 has 64KiB of SRAM, per the TRM the download area is only
> from 0x4020 to 0x4020F000 and exceeding that will cause failure to
> boot. Further, we need to make sure that we don't run into
> SRAM_SCRATCH_SPACE_ADDR as
9 matches
Mail list logo