[Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

I have had 3 towers in the past week have the Station side of the Backhaul link lock up and not transfer service to the tower until rebooted, but each stayed connected to the AP side of the Backhaul connection. In all 3 cases, I was able to log into both the AP and Station side of the backhaul lin

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

I had pretty much the same situation with 5.5.9. Change the hardware but still get the latest firmware. Rory -Original Message- From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of t...@byhalia.net Sent: Monday, November 7, 2016 11:03 AM To: ubnt_users@w

Re: [Ubnt_users] Backhaul Radios freeze on Station side

I have it happen on one particular ptmp rocket M5, doesnt seem to matter what FW ver its running... > On Nov 7, 2016, at 12:15, Rory Conaway wrote: > > I had pretty much the same situation with 5.5.9. Change the hardware but > still get the latest firmware. > > Rory > > -Original Message

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

What do you mean the WAN port goes to sleep? Partial traffic? Pulse once in awhile? Just real slow? Can you elaborate a little? I've got _3 recent installs_ of Nanobeams m2 13 doing almost exactly the same thing. WAN port appears to be asleep 1MBps/130MBps shown on main tab. Login takes f

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

Sounds to me (based on the TX) that the radio is not (trees or interference) seeing the ap. From: Jan-OOLLC Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 12:41 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5 What do you mean the WAN port goes to sleep? Partial

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

Well, has anyone tried these yet? On Tuesday, May 31, 2016, Steve Barnes wrote: > https://amplifi.com/ was what I was looking for. > > > > *Steve Barnes* > > GM > > *PCSWIN.COM * > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org > [mailto: > ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org > ] *On >

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

Yes ;) Love mine ;) On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, RickG wrote: > Well, has anyone tried these yet? > > On Tuesday, May 31, 2016, Steve Barnes wrote: > >> https://amplifi.com/ was what I was looking for. >> >> >> >> *Steve Barnes* >> >> GM >> >> *PCSWIN.COM * >> >> >> >> *F

Re: [Ubnt_users] WAN Port Goes to Sleep on PowerBeam M5

clear view of AP, no obstructions in path, great signal quality. All other types of CPEs working no issues, just nanobeams having Tx/Rx dropping to 1/130Mbps and sticking there Jan V On 11/07/2016 12:54 PM, Kees H wrote: Sounds to me (based on the TX) that the radio is not (trees or interfere

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

Me too. The in-laws have finally stopped complaining about their WiFi. :-) On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Ben Moore via Ubnt_users < ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote: > Yes ;) Love mine ;) > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:33 PM, RickG wrote: > >> Well, has anyone tried these yet? >> >> On Tuesday, Ma

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

Funny how we all get the in-laws of our backs first ;) On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Brandon Gilles wrote: > Me too. The in-laws have finally stopped complaining about their WiFi. > :-) > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Ben Moore via Ubnt_users < > ubnt_users@wispa.org> wrote: > >> Yes ;)

Re: [Ubnt_users] New UBNT device

+1 for in-law approved On Nov 7, 2016 10:15 PM, "Ben Moore via Ubnt_users" wrote: > Funny how we all get the in-laws of our backs first ;) > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Brandon Gilles > wrote: > >> Me too. The in-laws have finally stopped complaining about their WiFi. >> :-) >> >> On Mo