Hi,
On 03/02/2010 10:07 AM, Jacob Schmude wrote:
Hi
I'm confused about some of these. My thoughts inline under each bug
mentioned:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:54 +0530, Arky wrote:
Clock-applet inaccessible (regression)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581351
Yes, this one is
Arki, I wroted a comment with Desktop name is now x-nautilus-desktop
(regression) bugreport (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=555425
)
With your attached patch marking translation the new desktop accessible
name. If yes, this is fantastic, because oldest time (GNOME 2.22) the
desktop
Hi
I'm confused about some of these. My thoughts inline under each bug
mentioned:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 13:54 +0530, Arky wrote:
Clock-applet inaccessible (regression)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581351
Yes, this one is definitely an issue. The time can be read but the
Hi Jacob,
I just think priorities should be on actual performance and
crash-related problems first. They're the ones that hit hardest and make
the most impression when they do.
Yes, you are right. Last release of ubuntu failed to get many a11y users for
this very reason. We are making good
