Okay, I understand. Thanks, Sandeep.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Michael Casadevall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Marked invalid since there is no intrepid version. Please feel free to
> reopen once a newer package is available in intrepid or jaunty.
>
> ** Changed in: hardy-backports
> S
Moving back to Triaged. I'm an idiot; forgot about the meaning of In
Progress for Backports :-).
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: In Progress => Triaged
--
Subversion 1.5.1 does not work with SSL certificates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/265065
You received this bug notification
Marking this Triaged since it has been test built and appears to work,
however, I'm not sure if we should backport ufw and iptables; it feels
like a rather invasive change.
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: New => Triaged
--
Please backport ufw 0.22 from intrepid
https://bugs.launchp
Marked as In Progress since verification is complete. If there is a
workaround for GnuTLS, it may be preferable not to make this change.
Scott, your comments?
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided => Medium
Status: New => In Progress
--
Subversion 1.5.1 does not work wit
Marked invalid since there is no intrepid version. Please feel free to
reopen once a newer package is available in intrepid or jaunty.
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
Request: Please backport "tor" 0.2.xx to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275438
You
Public bug reported:
nautilus-clamscan does not exits in hardy but is useful
prevu nautilus-clamscan with no problem
I testing it now
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please backport nautilus-clamscan from intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27
** Changed in: acpi (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => acpi
--
ACPI Problem with Atom Based Board
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274535
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mai
