Sponsored backport with that command:
```
DEBFULLNAME="Luca Boccassi" UBUMAIL="bl...@debian.org" backportpackage -d noble
-c 2073502 -u ubuntu -v 0.15 package-notes
```
That created following changelog entry:
```
package-notes (0.15~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium
* No-change bac
bdrung, the stipped gdk lib would grow by ca. 90kb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933641
Title:
Enable broadway (HTML5) backend
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042
Title:
[backportpackage] errors out on packages with
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007908
Title:
[backportpackage] doesn't work if package isn'
Wouldn't it be better to tweak dpkg-source to look for "ubuntu", but not
for "~ubuntu"?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007042
Title:
[backportpackage] fails but worked
I downgraded the debhelper dependency to the lowest needed one (7.0.50~
for dh_override_* targets) and uploaded it as version 0.1.1. Please
backport that.
** Summary changed:
- Please backport packaging-dev 0.1
+ Please backport packaging-dev 0.1.1
** Description changed:
- Please backport pack
When I created the metapackage, I didn't tough about backporting it to
lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800224
Title:
Please backport packaging-dev 0.1
To m
I can confirm that it works with flashplugin-installer from natty-
security.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802044
Title:
Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0u
Public bug reported:
Please backport nspluginwrapper 1.4.2-0ubuntu2 to natty. It compiles
[1], installs, and runs.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status:
Here's the debdiff for lucid.
** Patch added: "lucid.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/800224/+attachment/2177080/+files/lucid.patch
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Public bug reported:
Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to natty, maverick, and lucid. It
builds without modification on natty and maverick and installs.
** Affects: lucid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 800224 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800224
Public bug reported:
Please backport packaging-dev 0.1 to maverick. It builds without
modification.
** Affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: maveri
Public bug reported:
Please backport indicator-multiload 0.1-0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds
without modification [1], installs and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bu
Marking as confirmed as recommended in bug #786483.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793709
Title:
P
Some scripts were moved from ubuntu-dev-tools to devscripts. One option
would be to backport devscripts 2.11.0 and ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124. The
problem with the versioning is that there will be more SRUs (for e.g.
distro-info).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.5.0ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without
modification [1], installs and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification bec
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.5.0~rc3ubuntu1 to natty. It builds without
modification [1] and works.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
- Please backport linti
As previous mentioned, source changes are required. You have to use the
attached patch for backporting the package to lucid.
** Patch added: "vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1~lucid1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/607505/+attachment/1702156/+files/vlc_1.1.4-1ubuntu1%7Elucid1.debdiff
** Summary changed:
- [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3
+ [test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1
--
[test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.4-1ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is sub
Ok, than your debdiff is alright. Let's get this as backport.
--
[test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing l
Why do you use "dh_install --list-missing"? Instead the debian/*.install
should be fixed.
--
[test-pkg-a] Please backport VLC 1.1.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607505
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
--
I am against the backport of ffmpeg v0.6. It will break the version of
audacity in lucid. The backport of FFmpeg can cause too many issues.
Instead vlc should be adjusted to build with the FFmpeg version of
lucid.
Attached a patch that will work on lucid. There is only one issue to
resolve: Check
uploaded
** Changed in: keepalived (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
[SRU] keepalived in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530945
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports m
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Please backport vlc to 0.9.8a in Intrepid (important security update)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307239
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy
uploaded
** Changed in: usbmount (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
[SRU] usbmount in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing l
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; you can upload the patch by yourself.
--
[SRU] usbmount in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530972
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backpo
Public bug reported:
Please backport lintian 2.3.1ubuntu1
It builds on karmic without changes. I used it heavily without problems.
I have uploaded an unchanged version to my backports PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive/backports
** Affects: karmic-backports
Importance: Undecided
** Changed in: libcm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Sponsors for universe (ubuntu-universe-sponsors) =>
(unassigned)
--
version too old
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/54287
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubun
** Summary changed:
- Backport adblock-plus 1.0.1-0ubuntu1 to intrepid
+ Please backport adblock-plus 1.1-0ubuntu1
** Description changed:
Recommended filter subscription for adblock-plus requires adblock-plus
- 1.0.1 to function properly, as seen in screenshot attached. I think it's
- a good
You do not need to backport automake1.10. You only have to add automake
to build dependencies. Have a look at my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bdrung/+archive
--
Please backport audacity 1.3.6-2 from Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301429
You received this bug notification because you are a
30 matches
Mail list logo
