** Description changed:
A recent change to sks packaging uses the dpkg-vendor command to
determine if the current OS derives from Ubuntu. dpkg-vendor is
provided by the dpkg-dev package, which sks does not, and should not
depend on.
In order for the postinst to behave properly, it ne
nentis-
Thanks for retesting.
I'm employed by Canonical to do this sort of work, and therefore won't
accept your bounty ;-)
Though I appreciate the gesture.
:-Dustin
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification becaus
Yes, Mathias.
We're interested in changes in behavior between 12.3 and 12.4.
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
I, too, tested raw images as well, and saw no problems.
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bu
** Summary changed:
- qcow2 corruption regression
+ kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
--
kvm-84: virtio on qcow2 broken (regression)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
Uploaded to:
* jaunty-proposed
* intrepid-backports
* hardy-backports
Awaiting archive approval. Please test this ASAP.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
--
qcow2 corruption regression
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404394
tu Intrepid)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Assignee: (unass
Uploaded to hardy-backports.
Thanks!
:-Dustin
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
James-
Thanks for syncing to intrepid.
Did you hit a blocker for syncing hardy? I'd like to help ensure that
this gets done this week too... What do you need from me?
:-Dustin
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification
Marking the intrepid task 'fix released', as kvm-84 has been rolled out
to intrepid-backports.
Now that that package has had some time to bake, and no issues have been
raised, I have uploaded to hardy-backports as well.
It should be in the queue, awaiting some archive-admin love...
:-Dustin
**
Subscribing ubuntu-archive-admin.
Michael ack'd this package a month or so ago. Can we get it into
intrepid-backports now, and hardy-backports very soon?
:-Dustin
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification because you are
Colin promoted it earlier today.
We're going make sure it doesn't break intrepid, and then do hardy
later this week.
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing T
Bump? Any progress, backports team?
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
u
Sponsored to intrepid-backports.
Ensuring that that works before uploading to hardy-backports.
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscrib
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404060 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 404060
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
--
Please backport libvirt-bin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259821
You received this bug notification becaus
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404060 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 404060
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
--
Please backport Libvirt-bin 0.5.1 from Jaunty to Hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321849
You received t
Attaching debdiff for intrepid.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "intrepid-libvirt-backport.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29482805/intrepid-libvirt-backport.debdiff
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification becau
Attaching debdiff for hardy.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "hardy-libvirt-backport.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29482779/hardy-libvirt-backport.debdiff
--
backport libvirt to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404060
You received this bug notification because you ar
Public bug reported:
I have spent several weeks developing, testing, and stabilizing a
backport of Jaunty's libvirt to both Hardy and Intrepid.
This backport should be handled in conjunction with the backport of
Jaunty's kvm-84 to hardy. While kvm-84 is not explicitly dependent on
this newer ver
Intrepid debdiff attached.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "intrepid-kvm-84-backport.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481886/intrepid-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you a
Hardy debdiff attached.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "hardy-kvm-84-backport.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481882/hardy-kvm-84-backport.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Jaunty's kvm-84 packages have been promoted from -proposed to -updates.
I think we're ready to proceed with the backport to hardy and intrepid.
:-Dustin
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Attaching a debdff for intrepid backport.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "intrepid-kvm-84.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28774805/intrepid-kvm-84.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
You received this bug notification because you are
Attaching a cleaner debdiff for hardy backport.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "hardy-kvm-84.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28774724/hardy-kvm-84.debdiff
** Attachment removed: "out.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28774314/out.debdiff
--
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396721
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
--
please backport kvm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252257
You received this bug notification because you are
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396721
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396721
backport kvm-84 to hardy and intrepid
--
Please backport kvm-72 and friends from intrepid to hardy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299183
You received
Full binary and source packages available in the PPA listed above.
Here, I'm attaching the debdiff between the package in jaunty-proposed
(sru pending) and the package I plan to upload to -backports, for your
review.
Changes between jaunty-proposed and the -backports package:
* depend on a debhe
Public bug reported:
I have spent several months developing, testing, and stabilizing a
backport of Jaunty's kvm-84 to both Hardy and Intrepid.
Hardy shipped with kvm-62, and Intrepid with kvm-72. While both of
these versions of kvm are suitable for some use cases, they both suffer
from some key
Per Jonathan's last comment, I'm going to mark this 'Incomplete', until
you guys can confirm that both packages have been tested adequately on
Intrepid. After that, please mark 'Confirmed' again, and the ubuntu-
archive team will handle this request.
Thanks,
:-Dustin
** Changed in: intrepid-back
) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
--
Please backport filezilla 3.2.2.1-1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335692
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports.
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backpo
* Trying to backport filezilla...
-
-
-
I: Extracting filezilla_3.2.2.1-1.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of filezilla-3.2.2.1 as 3.2.2.1-1~intrepid1 ... done.
** Changed in: intrepid-backports
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Please backport filezilla 3.2.2.1-1
http
[Updating] texmaker (1.7.1-2.1 [Ubuntu] < 1.8-1 [Debian])
* Trying to add texmaker...
- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
- http://ftp.debian.org/debian/>
I: texmaker [universe] -> texmaker_1.7.1-2.1 [universe].
** Changed in: texmaker (Ubuntu)
Status:
* Trying to backport ubuntu-dev-tools...
-
-
I: Extracting ubuntu-dev-tools_0.63.dsc ... done.
I: Building backport of ubuntu-dev-tools-0.63 as 0.63~intrepid1 ... done.
** Changed in: intrepid-backports
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Please backport ubuntu-dev-tools 0.63
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Cholakian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed spinkham, debian got the release out fast, what's going on here?
The Stable Release Update process for an Long Term Support release
such as Hardy involves a bit a work and justification on our end in
order to ro
For what it's worth, I also built php5 with and without Tormod's
debdiff.
I'm attaching a diff of the resulting test-results.txt (a regression
test suite built and run as part of php5's debuild).
No regressions reported by the test-results.txt diff.
:-Dustin
** Attachment added: "php5.test-resu
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Tormod Volden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a debdiff with the 5 stripped down security patches:
Thanks Tormod.
I've reviewed this debdiff. It applies cleanly and php builds cleanly
for me.
Kees and Jamie generally review these sorts of security fixes, so I
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Tormod Volden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mathias, shouldn't all security fixes go as SRU in hardy-security (or
> hardy-updates) and not in backports? Backports are for new features.
A complete merge of 5.2.6 would constitute a backport, as the version
has been bum
I just modified the bug description, and added the Hardy-Backports
project.
Packages are available in my PPA for testing.
:-Dustin
** Summary changed:
- PHP 5.2.6 fixes important security bugs
+ Please Backport PHP 5.2.6 -- fixes important security bugs
** Also affects: hardy-backports
Impo
39 matches
Mail list logo