[Bug 977178] Re: After upgrading to 12.04, flash doesn't seem to be installed to Firefox even though the package is.

2013-08-02 Thread Marcin Wojtczuk
Erm.. can you please explain in a few words how it is possible for such a major bug not to be fixed? I just upgraded from 10.04 LTS to 12.04 LTS and lost flash in Firefox. I did simmilar thing with my home machine (10.04 LTS - 11.04) and also lost flash, but hoped it was some kind of my

[Bug 977178] Re: After upgrading to 12.04, flash doesn't seem to be installed to Firefox even though the package is.

2013-08-02 Thread Marcin Wojtczuk
We have managed to get back Flash in Firefox 22 to work on Ubuntu 12.04. Steps: reinstall flashplugin-installer reinstall FIREFOX (sic!) move ~/.mozilla to backup directory Start firefox. All steps required - which suggests that the problem is not distribution-only. There is some kind of problem

[Bug 977178] Re: After upgrading to 12.04, flash doesn't seem to be installed to Firefox even though the package is.

2013-08-02 Thread Marcin Wojtczuk
Sadly te above fix is not true. We tested flash on youtube and got HTML5 video :( What really fixed the problem was forcing older librtmp version to install: sudo apt-get install librtmp0=2.4~20110711.gitc28f1bab-1 I had newer from XBMC custom repository and installing distribution, older

[Bug 697550] Re: HAProxy /etc/init.d/haproxy script fails to run by default

2011-01-10 Thread Marcin Wojtczuk
Thank you, above arguments are convincing. Please close this bug (I vote for close). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697550 Title: HAProxy /etc/init.d/haproxy script fails to run by

[Bug 697550] [NEW] HAProxy /etc/init.d/haproxy script fails to run by default

2011-01-05 Thread Marcin Wojtczuk
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: haproxy DIST: Ubuntu 10.4.1 LTS PACKAGE: haproxy-1.3.22-1 FILE: /etc/init.d/haproxy There is a problem running this script - it does not do anything; fails to start/stop/status. There is a strange variable in line 19: ENABLED=0 and then suspicious line