Fix is incl. in the jammy kernel since: Ubuntu-5.15.0-120.130
and we are currently at: 5.15.0.125.124 (jammy-updates)
and the fix is incl. in the noble kernel since: Ubuntu-6.8.0-48.48
and we are currently at: 6.8.0-48.48 (noble-updates).
Hence I'm updating the affects jammy and noble entries to Fi
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * update-initramfs fails wile running on a multipath system
+(in case multipath-tools-boot package is installed)
+due to issues in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions.
+
+ * copy_libgcc fails due to lack of folder h
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
** Tags added: erl-541
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069879
Title:
[needs-packaging] elos
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069877
Title:
[needs-packaging] safu
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069878
Title:
[needs-packaging] samconf
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075575
Title:
kexec fails in LPAR when some cpus are disabled
To mana
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076587 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Status: Inco
Now trying to find some differences in the systems,
you already shared the lsblk output in comment #26.
Would you mind also sharing the output of:
multipath -ll
lscpu
and
lsmem
?
And the existing disk configuration (before the wipefs), where did it came from
- or how was it generated?
Was it a p
Fantastic, Anushree!
Many thanks for the successful verification !!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
Title:
cpu hotplug crashes the guest!
To manage notifications about this bu
So first of all it looks like there is an issue, probably duplicate entries, in
your archive configuration ("sources") files:
/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu.sources
that is producing some "configured multiple times" Warnings.
Maybe you had "noble-proposed" already enabled?!
B
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
Title:
cpu hotplug crashes the guest!
To manage notifications
Many thanks Gautam!
I'ce noticed that the commit was upstream tagged as stable update for 6.8+:
"Fixes: ec0f6639fa88 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Ensure LPCR_MER bit is
passed to the L0")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v6.8+"
which is perfect, since with that it will be automatically be picked u
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074380
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] s390/cpum_cf: make crypto counters upward com
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
No problem, we can mark this LP bug as duplicate of LP#2083131.
I actually just dit it.
(I'll manually sync between then, not a big deal.)
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2083131
Bash's bu
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Tags removed: installer
** Tags added: installation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055702
Title:
** Tags added: installation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080474
Title:
ubuntu installation failing for systems having SAN disk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
@Sylvestre There is no package 'libc++1-18' selectable in Launchpad, closest is
llvm-toolchain-18.
I've marked this as affecting llvm-defaults, since this is the source package
of libc++1.
But I can mark llvm-toolchain-18 on top.
@Ulrich Thanks for the clarification (and pointing to this mismatc
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086782
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Exception handling support is disabled in
libc++/libc++
Well, may I asked how important this is to have "back" in 24.04?
I'm just asking because enabling this is actually 'enabling a feature', and not
really covered by the SRU policy.
However, enabling this with the current development release "Plucky" and onward
should be possible.
--
You received
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2086782
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Exception handling support is disabled in
libc++/libc++abi
To manage not
I think this (libc++1) applies to source package 'llvm-defaults'.
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => llvm-defaults (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipp
Updating affected noble entry to 'Fix Released' since it's incl. in the
latest update:
$ git log --oneline --grep "powerpc/pseries: Fix scv instruction crash with
kexec"
a71dd6f9b4ef powerpc/pseries: Fix scv instruction crash with kexec
$ git tag --contains a71dd6f9b4ef
Ubuntu-6.8.0-48.48
Ubuntu-
It looks like we could reproduce this on a different platform.
And it seems to be a race condition in multipath itself, hence adding
multipath-tools as affected package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Title:
mkinitramfs fails with copy_file binary '/libgcc_s.so.[1-9]
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080474
Title:
ubuntu installation failing for systems having SAN
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076406
Title:
L2 Guest migration: continuously dumping while running N
The kernel was today released to noble-updates:
linux-generic | 6.8.0-48.48| noble-updates | amd64, arm64,
armhf, ppc64el, s390x
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => F
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076147
Title:
Add 'mm: hold PTL from the first PTE while reclaiming a
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076866
Title:
Guest crashes post migration with migrate_misplaced_foli
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070329
Title:
KOP L2 guest fails to boot with 1 core - SMT8 topology
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039
Title:
[Ubuntu-24.04] FADump with recommended crash size is mak
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085548
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.10] bash printf of floating point value fails on Ubuntu
24.1
Thanks Peter and Carl for the update and deep investigation. Once the
Valgrind patch is upstream accepted, we'll see if we go with the new
Valgrind version for Ubuntu 'Plucky'-release (currently development
release) and onwards and leave the the build time tests on ppc64el
skipped for older release
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => coreutils (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) =>
(unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
There is btw. one even never kernel 6.8.0-48, that is currently in
proposed.
(
sudo add-apt-repository -y "deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/
$(lsb_release -sc)-proposed main universe" && sudo apt -y update && sudo apt -y
-t=noble-proposed install linux-generic # && sudo reboot
)
--
You
So I can confirm that both patches that were mentioned:
7be6ce7043b4 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Cancel pending DEC exception")
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/noble/commit/?h=master&id=cc8339a0e5005e78c4b8526f014d706c4b28e4c8
180c6b072bf3 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S
Hi Benjamin,
well I thought about simplifying copy_libgcc too.
But it already has the signature for libdir/library and I didn't wanted to
remove it,
and according to the SRU process I think that changing just the way it is
called is less impact-full than modifying the function itself (body and
s
So let's wait then on the MR and take it from there...
(Just hope it doesn't take that long, due to the consequence of this - failed
to boot 24.10 on s390x).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
In Debian's multipath-tools changelog changelog I found for 0.8.8(-1):
"
* [4ab9ce2] Drop old dmsetup_env hack
dmsetup long supports DM_NAME and DM_UUID, and the other variables
are not used anymore.
"
which makes me think that line
copy_exec /usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env
in
/usr/share/initr
The error:
"mkinitramfs: copy_file: binary '/libgcc_s.so.[1-9]' not found"
can be solved by:
43c43
< copy_libgcc
---
> copy_libgcc $DESTDIR/usr/lib/$(uname -m)-linux-gnu/
Just a bit unsure if there is a better way to specify the arch specific path.
Using dpkg-architecture would req. to have dpkg-
Added multipath-tools (due to multipath-tools-boot) as affected package.
** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Ta
Hello kowshik, yes, if this is the outcome, I agree that we should
change/update wiki:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ppc64el/Recommendations
(and I think also the Ubuntu Server guide) accordingly.
Thanks for pointing that out!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Hello @hbathini, thank you for the detailed explanation which makes much sense.
With that I'll update the tags for this LP bug accordingly to verification-done.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux
--
You received this bug notification bec
Line
copy_exec /usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env
(as well as the one before: copy_exec /usr/sbin/dmsetup)
is in oracular's multipath-tools-boot v0.9.9-1ubuntu3 only, but not in noble's
0.9.4-5ubuntu8 -- the file /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/multipath seem to
differ quite a bit between the two packag
I have no idea what "/usr/lib/udev/dmsetup_env" is all about, since it
is not in oracular, nor in noble, and also does not have a package it
would belong to.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Comparing it with a 24.04 (SAN/SCSI/multipath) installation, update-
initramfs performs like this:
$ sudo update-initramfs -k all -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.8.0-47-generic
Using config file '/etc/zipl.conf'
Run /lib/s390-tools//zipl_helper.device-mapper /boot
Building bootm
The 'hook-functions' where the code is included is actually part of
initramfs-tools-core:
dpkg -S /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
initramfs-tools-core: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
** Also affects: initramfs-tools
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** No longer af
** Description changed:
- I recently did an 24.10 install (on s390x, but I think this doesn't
- matter) and was surprised that the system hangs during the post-install
- reboot.
+ I recently did an 24.10 install and was surprised that the system hangs
+ during the post-install reboot.
Investi
Another final successful verification was done (using all affected components,
means kernel, qemu and s390-tools), please see the details here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1959965/comments/17
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
Many thanks Marc for the successful verification of the three affected
components (kernel, qemu and s390-tools)!
I am updating the LP bug tags accordingly and will cross-reference your
successful verification also in LP#1959940 and LP#1959966.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-ne
A final successful verification was done (using all affected components, means
kernel, qemu and s390-tools), please see the details here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools/+bug/1959965/comments/17
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
This is re-createable all time, a system is in place for further
investigation (remote access) and testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085157
Title:
mkinitramfs fails with copy_f
$ env --unset=LD_PRELOAD ldd /usr/lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
linux-vdso64.so.1 (0x03ffca8fe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/s390x-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x03ffabd0)
/lib/ld64.so.1 (0x03ffac08)
$
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
I recently did an 24.10 install (on s390x, but I think this doesn't
matter) and was surprised that the system hangs during the post-install
reboot.
Investigation showed that this happens if the installer applies updates,
which is done by default, if there is proper network co
modified the hook-functions script (at line 252 ff) a bit to gather some
more details and yes:
$ grep -A 10 "copy_libgcc()" /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hook-functions
copy_libgcc() {
local libdir library
libdir="$1"
echo "1" "$1"
for library in "${libdir}"/libgcc_s.
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical LXD team (canonical-lxd)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085127
Title:
lxc/1:5.0.3-2ubuntu7 ADT test failure with
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003374
Title:
Undefined Behavior Sanitizer (UBSAN) causes failure to match
@paulw2u, you are right, I should have named the release I am using. It
is ubuntu-studio 24.04. And as well i had tried to find out which
package this problem is in, but I wasn't able. I tried to find out which
package maintaines the source.list but wasn't able to.
--
You received this bug notifi
A new test build was done in PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1959965-2nd
And the packages were again tested in the same infrastructure like before
and all tests were completed successful this time (normal zdump and zdump in
SE).
Hence I'm attaching the new deddiff here and
I was contacted via a side channel and got the following update on the
verification:
While the verification (regression testing) of a normal zdump was successful,
the Secure Execution guest dump (with encryption with customer keys) failed.
So this is a 'verification-failed-jammy'!
The infrastruc
Many thanks Anushree for this double verification, now also with macvtap
- that's great and gives confidence.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076406
Title:
L2 Guest migration: continu
No, no need for further verification, that was already done, see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2070329/comments/10
and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2070329/comments/11
(just this tag 'verification-needed-noble-linux' is the relevant one for
us here -
Great Anushree! Thanks for your verification on this - that gives
confidence to roll out the kernel!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076866
Title:
Guest crashes post migration with mi
Any updates or idea @kowshik?
Do we need to pull the commit again from the kernel?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060039
Title:
[Ubuntu-24.04] FADump with recommended crash size is m
Thanks Anushree for the successful verification!
(I'll update the tags accordingly ...)
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
Ok, many thx, Anushree!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076866
Title:
Guest crashes post migration with migrate_misplaced_folio+0x4cc/0x5d0
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Also affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello Kowshik, thanks for the verification, even if the result is not
like expected :-/
I double checked if the patch is properly included:
~/ubuntu-noble-master-next/noble-clean$ git log --oneline --grep
"powerpc/64s/radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity"
ec65624fc069 powerpc/64s
Thanks for the verification, Thomas!
(I'm adjusting the tags accordingly)
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Hello Anushree, well I doubt yes, according to our SRU process, a
validation with the package in -proposed is needed.
To enable proposed (in Ubuntu 24.04):
sudo add-apt-repository -y "deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/
$(lsb_release -sc)-proposed main universe"
< $ sudo apt update # but
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076587
Title:
cpu hotplug crashes the guest!
To manage notifications a
Thanks Andreas for the update and bringing this upstream.
I'll reference the upstream bug with the LP bug meta data to stay informed ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Man thanks Gautam for the successful verification!
(I'm updating the tags accordingly ...)
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
The corresponding s390-tools LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959965
was addressed, a test package built, debdiffs uploaded and after another check
the package uploaded.
(Please notice that the debdiff attached to the LP bug misses the LP reference,
but I've added that before uploading).
attaching the two debdiffs (s390-tools and s390-tools-signed).
** Attachment added: "debdiff.tgz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1959965/+attachment/5828091/+files/debdiff.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
lintian does not show any errors, and the warning (on the binaries) are
already reported upstream (and partially fixed in newer versions).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959965
Title:
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ --
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * Hypervisor-initiated dumps for Secure Execution (aka confidential
computing)
+guests (on s390x) are not helpful because memory and CPU state is encrypted
+by a transient key only available to the Ult
s390-tools test package is currently being build here:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1959965
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959965
Title:
[22.04 FEAT] KVM: Secure
Like discussed, due to the slightly older code based, the following patches are
also needed to get a clean build:
4e02dc87515f ("pvattest: uvio.c: remove endianness handling")
d69b9fab4a9e ("pvattest: build_attestation_v1_ioctl: make the code more robust")
330ddb7adba3 ("libpv: add `copied` parame
Many thx Anushree for the successful verification!
(I'm updating the tags accordingly ...)
** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-noble-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Public bug reported:
Es konnte nicht ermittelt werden, welche Systemaktualisierungen
verfügbar sind
Ein unlösbares Problem trat während der Berechnung der
Systemaktualisierung auf.
Die wurde wahrscheinlich verursacht durch:
* Inoffizielle Software-Pakete, die nicht von Ubuntu bereitgestellt we
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959965
Title:
[22.04 FEAT] KVM: Secure Execution guest dump encryption w
Moving over comments that were accidentally added to LP#2003680 to this
LP bug (where they belong to):
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-09 09:46 EDT---
Thanks @Marc for providing the list of patches/ commits that are required for a
SRU to Ubuntu 22.04 (with s390-tools 2.20.0
@ahasenack Please let me provide an overview of the overall status of
the 'Secure Execution guest dump encryption with customer keys'
situation:
The kernel part was reviewed, accepted and got applied to jammy master-next by
the kernel team and is currently in -proposed (it was also used for the
Public bug reported:
I want to install the file and folder manager named Krusader in my
Plasma desktop and found the button for installing here:
"https://apps.kde.org/de/krusader/"; This is an appstream link that opens
Discover. In discover an error is displayed (in german language so I try
to tra
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => subiquity
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => Med
Public bug reported:
Error happened during do-release-upgrade to Noble.
The server doesn't boot any more due to an UEFI file missing.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: grub-pc 2.12-1ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-122.132-generic 5.15.163
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-1
Many thanks Peter for your investigation so far!
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061913
Title:
PMDK FTBFS on ppc
Many thanks Janosch !
(I'm updating the tags accordingly ...)
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Okay, thx Gautam for the update of the plan.
So I'm leaving the status of this bug to incomplete - for now.
Please share the commit(s) of the fix, once they were sent to upstream, so that
we can track the inclusion into the Ubuntu kernels (6.8 for Ubuntu 24.04 and
6.11 for Ubuntu 24.10) here.
T
Hello Gautam, thanks for the explanation on why the system is getting
stuck in this particular case.
Well, you've mentioned in the bug description that reverting the following two
commits:
df938a5576f3 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV nestedv2: Do not inject certain interrupts
ec0f6639fa88 KVM: PPC: Book3S HV
Many thanks for test and verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070358
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04] FW1060.00 (NH1060_026) sosreport is running to Kernel
OOPS crash
To manage notif
Many thanks for test and verification!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075575
Title:
kexec fails in LPAR when some cpus are disabled
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
The attached deb file (amd64) has the corrected gecos option in the
postinst script. To overcome the half-installed flatpak run `dpkg -i
flatpak_1.14.6-1ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb`.
** Attachment added: "flatpak_1.14.6-1ubuntu0.1_amd64.deb"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/20832
The bug affected me too under an up2date Ubuntu 24.04.
During installation the packet fails at the postinst step with the error
message: `fatal: Only one or two names allowed.`
This errors is yielded by the `adduser` execution inside of the postinst
script. It has it's cause in the `--gecos "Flat
** Tags added: s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
--
You r
** Tags removed: petest-448
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072641
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] KVM: s390: unhandled guest LPSWEY instruction
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
** Tags added: pei-674
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060108
Title:
greenlet 3.0.3 fails to build on ppc64el (and riscv64)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs
I'm closing the Ubuntu entries here as Fix Released,
since with greenlet v3.0.3-0ubuntu5.1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-greenlet/3.0.3-0ubuntu5.1
we rebuilt the package without frame-pointers that solves the issue.
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: Triaged => Fix Re
1 - 100 of 2908 matches
Mail list logo
