[Bug 2070433] Re: A snap update is downloaded twice

2024-09-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
this fixed by 2.66, but worst case it may end up in some of the point releases that follow. Maciej ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Maciej Borzecki (maciek-borzecki) ** Changed in: snapd (

[Bug 2080351] [NEW] libnvidia-gl-535-server:i386 not instalalble

2024-09-11 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Public bug reported: It is not possible to install libnvidia-gl-535-server on i386 due to missing libnvidia-egl-wayland1. root@u2:~# apt-get install -y libnvidia-common-535-server libnvidia-compute-535-server:amd64 libnvidia-compute-535-server:i386 libnvidia-decode-535-server:amd64 libnvidia-de

[Bug 2075754] [NEW] libnvidia-extra-535:i386 is missing gbm symlink

2024-08-02 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Public bug reported: I have libnvidia-extra-535 installed for amd64 and i386 my system: root@nvidiatest:~# dpkg -l |grep libnvidia-extra ii libnvidia-extra-535:amd64 535.183.01-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 amd64Extra libraries for the NVIDIA driver ii libnvidia-extra-535:i386

[Bug 2075753] [NEW] libnvidia-compute-515 contains incorrectly packaged libnvidia-compute

2024-08-02 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Public bug reported: The packaging of libnvidia-compute-515 seems wrong. There's a top level /NVIDIA-Linux directory with a single library in it. root@nvidiatest:~# find / -name 'libnvidia-nvvm*' -ls 22924474 4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 27 2023 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gn

[Bug 2070433] Re: A snap update is downloaded twice

2024-06-25 Thread Maciej Borzecki
The task for download is always present, but the actual task handler doesn't do anything if the file is already cached. Are you saying that you actually observed the file firefox snap (or delta) be downloaded twice? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received t

[Bug 2059195] Re: package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2058810 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058810 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2058810 Unable to purge snapd on the freshly installed system -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 2069488] Re: package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2058810 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058810 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2059195 package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ** This bug h

[Bug 2069514] Re: package snapd 2.63+22.04 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2058810 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058810 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 2059195 package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ** This bug h

[Bug 2069665] Re: package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 已安装 snapd 软件包 post-removal 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2058810 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058810 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059195 package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 ** This b

[Bug 2069488] Re: package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059195 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059195 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059195 package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 -- You r

[Bug 1958812] Re: If apt installs snap package, then warn, because maybe i dont want snap package.

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
FWIW, I'm going to mark this as invalid for the snapd package as snapd isn't really involved in making any decisions about how other packages choose to work or be distributed. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2069514] Re: package snapd 2.63+22.04 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-06-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2059195 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059195 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2059195 package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1 -- You r

[Bug 2059195] Re: package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-03-27 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I've opened a related PR to the firefox snap which replaces the problematic interface with system-files https://github.com/canonical/firefox-snap/pull/53 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Bug 2059195] Re: package snapd 2.58+22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-03-27 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I was able to reproduce this with 22.04, snapd 2.61.1. This is what is reported by findmnt: ``` maciek@vm:~$ findmnt TARGETSOURCE FSTYPE OPTIONS / /dev/vda2

[Bug 1921289] Re: snap changes exit 1 when no changes found

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
This was fixed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1823974 and released in 2.51 ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921

[Bug 1899794] Re: Error during refresh of snapd leads to unusable system

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I believe a problem addressing snap-failure and snapd has been fixed a couple of releases back. Should the problem persist, please leave a comment. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: snapd Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this b

[Bug 1762072] Re: Indicator icons not loading for certain snap applications

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Also affects: snapd-desktop Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762072 Title: Indicator icons not loading for certain snap applications To

[Bug 1874660] Re: Please make an "update in progress" message for snap updates

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Also affects: snapd-desktop Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874660 Title: Please make an "update in progress" message for snap updates

[Bug 1908159] Re: snapd lost snaps

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Do you still experience the problem? If so, can you collect the output of: snap list --all I understand it has been a while since this had happened, but should this happen again, please collect the output of the journal (journalctl --no-pager preferrably). ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1873621] Re: package snapd 2.38~14.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 5

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Is this still an issue? 2.38 and 2.42 are very old releases. I'm going to set this to incomplete. Please leave a comment if you still experience the problem. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 1961791] Re: 2.54.3+21.10.1ubuntu0.1 broke Plasma Desktop when Fish is the default shell

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961791 Title: 2.54.3+21.10.1ubuntu0.1 broke Plasma Desktop when Fish is the default shell To

[Bug 1907056] Re: Please add meta/kernel.yaml

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907056 Title: Please add meta/kernel.yaml To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://b

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
AFAIU support for pulling in dtbs from the kernel snap is already in snapd. We've recently also fixed a problem with AppArmor profile that blocked access to the GPU device, perhaps that's related. The PR that contains the fix is https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11822 -- You received this bu

[Bug 1905272] Re: Can't get h/w video acceleration on rpi4

2022-05-26 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you please pull the latest pi kernel and gadget from 20/stable, snapd from edge and verify if things are working for you? ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 1968878] Re: systemd-udevd: video4linux: Process '/usr/lib/snapd/snap-device-helper add ... /class/video4linux 0:0' failed with exit code 1.

2022-05-23 Thread Maciej Borzecki
On top of what Alberto already requested, please provide the output of: udevadm info /sys/class/video4linux and udevadm info /dev/video* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968878 Ti

[Bug 1968878] Re: systemd-udevd: video4linux: Process '/usr/lib/snapd/snap-device-helper add ... /class/video4linux 0:0' failed with exit code 1.

2022-05-23 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Device 0:0 and devpath /class/video4linux do not look right. I suspect that the udev rules generated by the camera interface are too broad and they catch /sys/class/video4linux as well as the actual devices. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1971955] Re: systemd-udevd call unshare process when attaching nvme volume

2022-05-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you attach the contents of /etc/os-release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971955 Title: systemd-udevd call unshare process when attaching nvme volume To manage notifications

[Bug 1871148] Re: services start before apparmor profiles are loaded

2022-05-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@eurbah hi, also for the service in question, can you attach the output of `systemctl list-dependencies --after snap..service` AFAICT, all services are to be started after snapd.apparmor.d, which in turn is started after apparmor.service, which should ensure that apparmor profiles are loaded befor

[Bug 1971955] Re: systemd-udevd call unshare process when attaching nvme volume

2022-05-13 Thread Maciej Borzecki
For the record, does /usr/bin/unshare exist in your system? Can you run the command that Alberto provided in the console? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971955 Title: systemd-udevd

[Bug 1972910] Re: error: too many arguments for command

2022-05-12 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Also affects: snapd Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: snapd Milestone: None => 2.56 -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 1972871] Re: mosquitto snap produces high CPU load

2022-05-11 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Are there any denials being logged? Anything in dmesg? Did you move the extracted snap binaries to a container? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 1972910] Re: error: too many arguments for command

2022-05-11 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Seems like a low hanging fruit, so I opened a PR to snapd: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11776 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972910 Title: error: too many arguments for com

[Bug 1972910] Re: error: too many arguments for command

2022-05-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Maciej Borzecki (maciek-borzecki) ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1971491] Re: After reboot firefox refuses to run snap-confine has elevated permissions and is not confined but should be. Refusing to continue to avoid permission escalation attacks

2022-05-03 Thread Maciej Borzecki
AFAIU this happens when appamor.service is disabled and does not start during the boot or there is no apparmor profile for snap-confine. Can you make sure that `systemctl show apparmor.service` shows that it's enabled, and attach the output of `sudo aa-status |grep snap-confine` ? ** Changed in: s

[Bug 1970025] Re: Tried to update Snapd from the GUI, it logged me out

2022-04-29 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I suspect this was caused by udev reload, which we have observed previously and I believe it was fixed in gdm by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/merge_requests/175 ** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2022-04-11 Thread Maciej Borzecki
FWIW systemd --user is expected to have been started as part of your session. This is supposed to be fully automatic. I don't think you can start it yourself, as it's up to systemd/logind to properly start the process and move it to the right cgroup. I've added systemd to the bug report, so maybe t

[Bug 1967479] Re: snaps lost connections during 22.04 upgrade

2022-04-03 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@n.buechner no, that's a different problem, most likely: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1961898 although in your case it hit a 25s and still did not get a response from systemd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1965682] Re: package snapd 2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-03-21 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Thanks for reporting this. Do I understand correctly that you have moved the content to /var/lib/snapd and bind mounted that location on top of the original path? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-03-18 Thread Maciej Borzecki
It appears that the same version of apparmor parser (2.13.3 as reported by Simon), behaves differently when running in the container. Specifically, the command that snapd also executes did not fail in the container, while it should have. Actually there's even an error message but the exit code is s

[Bug 1965328] Re: transient scope could not be started error in bionic lxd container

2022-03-18 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Let me reiterate what I mentioned in the MM channel. The snap in question apparently uses device access in which case we'll set up device filtering. The host being impish, uses cgroup v2, which percolates to the container. Since it's v2, device filtering is implemented by attaching a BPF program on

[Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-03-12 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I pulled a clean 20.04 cloud image VM from https://cloud- images.ubuntu.com/focal/current/ root@ubuntu:/home/guest# grep PRETTY /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS" root@ubuntu:/home/guest# uname -a Linux ubuntu 5.4.0-104-generic #118-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 2 19:02:41 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86

[Bug 1963861] Re: Can't tell what application will be launched with custom schemes

2022-03-08 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@alexmurray that code has never listed or show which application would handle given URL scheme. The change affected the implementation of io.snapcraft.Launcher, which is only called as a fallback when a snap calls xdg-open inside it's namespace. The primary handler that is tried goes through the de

[Bug 1957948] Re: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1)

2022-02-25 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@ytvwld I have 2.54.3+20.04.1ubuntu0.2 version: ``` guest@ubuntu:~$ dpkg -l snapd Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version

[Bug 1839237] Re: snapd disk write usage very high on 19.04 with snapd 2.39.3

2022-02-24 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@takeseem unfortunately due to a bug in LP I cannot access the image. Can you rename the image to use latin characters only and upload it again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839237 T

[Bug 1961898] Re: chromium-browser is refusing to start

2022-02-24 Thread Maciej Borzecki
If this happens again try running `SNAPD_DEBUG=1 snap run telegram- desktop` and collect the log. Since 22.04 is using unified hierarchy, we try to ask your session's systemd to create a transient scope for it. In your case, the log indicates that this operation failed. Looking at the log: Feb 23

[Bug 1960702] Re: all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

2022-02-23 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1960702] Re: all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

2022-02-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 Indeed, I may have acted to fast marking this as a duplicate of the other bugs. The problem is somewhat related to the other bugs in that both go down to fish shell snapd setup and how fragile the desktop se

[Bug 1961418] Re: snap failed to run with '/usr/bin/snap wait system seed.loaded'

2022-02-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@gsunipipeline it looks like systemd does not operate correctly in your system. This is a prerequisite for even accessing the snapd daemon, since we rely on systemd to provide the socket, then activate snapd daemon, and the snapd daemon directly interacts with systemd to set up snaps. ** Also aff

[Bug 1961418] Re: snap failed to run with '/usr/bin/snap wait system seed.loaded'

2022-02-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Does running `systemctl status` work at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961418 Title: snap failed to run with '/usr/bin/snap wait system seed.loaded' To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2022-02-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@lukeweller you probably guessed this is not part of any release yet. Documentation will be there in due time. In the meantime you're welcome to contribute to the discussion in the forum or grab snapd from edge and try it out yourself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2022-02-22 Thread Maciej Borzecki
@lukeweller 3 commens up there's: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bug/1575053/comments/308 there's also a forum topic with more details: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/experimental-flag-for-hiding-snap/28509 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1961365] Re: 2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.1 update on bionic breaks fish shell

2022-02-21 Thread Maciej Borzecki
This should work even for fish 2.7: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11416 Anyone wants to give it a try? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961365 Title: 2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.1 u

[Bug 1961365] Re: 2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.1 update on bionic breaks fish shell

2022-02-21 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Yes, sorry my bad. Fish in bionic is even older, and thus requires more contrived workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961365 Title: 2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.1 update on bionic br

[Bug 1960972] Re: All snap applications missing from gnome-search after update

2022-02-20 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages f

[Bug 1960702] Re: all snap apps gone after snap upgrade

2022-02-20 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages f

[Bug 1961365] Re: 2.54.3+18.04.2ubuntu0.1 update on bionic breaks fish shell

2022-02-20 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages f

[Bug 1957948] Re: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1)

2022-02-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Also affects: snapd Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: snapd Assignee: (unassigned) => Maciej Borzecki (maciek-borzecki) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 1957948] Re: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1)

2022-02-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
One more fix for fish https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/11371 seems to work in Focal VM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 Title: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_co

[Bug 1960492] Re: Snapd incompatible with fish, breaking x2go

2022-02-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages f

[Bug 1959417] Re: unable to use jupyter-notebook package with snap'd browsers like firefox or chromium

2022-02-03 Thread Maciej Borzecki
> I wonder if we should make an exception for "~/.local/" or "~/.local/share/", though, since that generally contains data which could potentially be useful for applications. I think that's risky. Off the top of my head ~/.local/share/Trash is where files go when you remove then in Nautilus, or th

[Bug 1958676] Re: error: too early for operation, device not yet seeded or device model not acknowledged Install failed

2022-01-23 Thread Maciej Borzecki
The error indicates that snapd is still in the process of early init & setting up device. Ideally it's enough to wait for seed.loaded event, (snap wait system seed.loaded). This is what snapd.seeded.service does, but from the piece of log you provided, the service did not start, because its depende

[Bug 1957948] Re: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1)

2022-01-19 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 Title: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish functi

[Bug 1958022] Re: fish integration broken in focal

2022-01-19 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1957948 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1957948 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages f

[Bug 1957948] Re: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a call in vendor_conf.d/snapd.fish to fish function `fish_add_path` which requires fish 3.2 or later (Impish only packages fish 3.1)

2022-01-14 Thread Maciej Borzecki
This was fixed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1957155 which so far is available only in snapd master. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957948 Title: 2.54.2+21.10 introduces a

[Bug 1956942] Re: snap can not start chromium-browser with cgroup v2 and hierarchy

2022-01-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951491 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491 2022/01/10 12:58:44.388636 tracking.go:185: DEBUG: using session bus 2022/01/10 12:58:44.393780 tracking.go:290: DEBUG: StartTransientUnit failed with "org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited": [Proces

[Bug 1956942] Re: snap can not start chromium-browser with cgroup v2 and hierarchy

2022-01-10 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Please attach the output of `SNAPD_DEBUG=1 snap run chromium-browser`. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956942 Title: sn

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-12-20 Thread Maciej Borzecki
No, it just means that the journal is not collecting any user session logs. I'm afraid this is beyond snapd scope at this point. Perhaps you can try to make you openbox session to be more like what GNOME and KDE set up, that is with systemd user instance that can be accessed via dbus. I don't know

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-12-13 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Ok, so the logs you attached earlier are: 2021/12/03 15:21:45.540312 tracking.go:45: DEBUG: creating transient scope snap.chromium.chromium 2021/12/03 15:21:45.543273 tracking.go:185: DEBUG: using session bus 2021/12/03 15:21:45.547127 tracking.go:290: DEBUG: StartTransientUnit failed with "org.

[Bug 1920107] Re: Failed messages of sd-umount shown with reboot/shutdown

2021-12-09 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Valentin has 2 PRs up to address this on the snapd/core20 side: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/9 and https://github.com/snapcore/core20/pull/124 ** Changed in: snapd Assignee: (unassigned) => Valentin David (valentin.david) ** Changed in: snapd Status: Confirmed => In Prog

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-12-07 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you run `systemctl --user`? Does it work at all? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491 Title: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup To manage notification

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-12-05 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Snapd needs to talk to systemd user instance to setup a scope for the snap. This is done over a session bus. Is DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS set in your environment? Run `echo $DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS`, the output should be like `unix:path=/run/user/NNN/bus` (where NNN is your uid). Can you then run

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-11-25 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491 Title: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup To manage no

[Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2021-11-25 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you run `SNAPD_DEBUG=1 snap run firefox` and attach the output? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951491 Title: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup To mana

[Bug 1950855] Re: Can't enable snap to print on a usb printer

2021-11-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
You can collect a strace of the app by running: snap run --strace='-vf -s 256' cura-slicer.cura And yes, as @alexmurray indicated, this may be something with device cgroups. The problem with those is there is nothing logged if access is denied, making the debugging process complicated. Assumi

[Bug 1947203] Re: Snap applications cannot start

2021-10-15 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you run `sudo systemctl restart apparmor.service snapd.apparmor.service` and see if that fixes your problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947203 Title: Snap applications cannot

[Bug 1947203] Re: Snap applications cannot start

2021-10-15 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I see this in the attached journal: Oct 14 22:53:56 audit[1790]: AVC apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" profile="snap-update-ns.lxd" name="/proc/1790/cgroup" pid=1790 comm="5" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 Which is unexpectd as reading own /proc//cgroup is allowed by the profi

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-10-07 Thread Maciej Borzecki
There don't appear to be any AppArmor denials in the logs provided. From snap debug seeding output, looks like the command `udevadm trigger --subsystem-nomatch=input` failed when invoked during installation of the snapd, which was done outside of confinement. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1946086] Re: systemd user daemon fails with Permission denied when creating transient scope

2021-10-05 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Possibly related: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3388 ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #3388 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/3388 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 1946086] [NEW] systemd user daemon fails with Permission denied when creating transient scope

2021-10-05 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Public bug reported: Observed on 18.04. Systemd user instance fails when trying to create a transient scope when logged in through ssh as a regular user Specifically this fails: $ systemd-run --user --scope ls Job for run-rc78f932ad730440490bd7bc17f9d5c8c.scope failed. See "systemctl status run-r

[Bug 1934147] Re: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes

2021-09-30 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934147 Title: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1925507] Re: grub-common: snapd autopkgtests fail on s390x

2021-09-30 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925507 Title: grub-common: snapd autopkgtests fail on s390x To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1943853] Re: Ubuntu update disconnected all snaps

2021-09-30 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Any chance you could collect the journal logs from 2021-09-16. I think this command should provide the output: `journalctl --since 2021-09-16 --until 2021-09-17`. I'm switching this bug to Fix Committed, as we landed a fix to not loose connections if the snaps happen to be unavailable and it was a

[Bug 1894115] Re: After upgrade of packages cannot open applications installed through snap

2021-09-30 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Please attach the output of `snap list --all`, and then the output of `snap connections libreoffice`. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-09-24 Thread Maciej Borzecki
The PR is up: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10839 also needs +1 from security ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-09-24 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Thanks to @mwhudson for arranging access to the test host. Per his comments I launched both 20210903 and 20210904 snapshots of impish. Debugging, I noticed that there was an apparmor denial logged when snap (the snap binary from snapd) was transitioning to snap-confine. While snap-confine runs unde

[Bug 1944004] Re: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64

2021-09-23 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Adding SNAP_CONFINE_DEBUG=1 in the env will produce more debugging output. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944004 Title: snapd.seeded.service never finishes on non-amd64 To manage no

[Bug 1943853] Re: Recent update DELETED SNAP PROGRAMS

2021-09-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I suspect that for gimp and chromium you need to run those again, but swap authy for either "gimp" or "chromium": sudo snap connect authy:gnome-3-28-1804 gnome-3-28-1804 sudo snap connect authy:gtk-3-themes gtk-common-themes:gtk-3-themes sudo snap connect authy:icon-themes gtk-common-themes:icon-t

[Bug 1943853] Re: Recent update DELETED SNAP PROGRAMS

2021-09-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
At least to get authy back you can try running the following commands: for iface in browser-support desktop desktop-legacy gsettings home network opengl unity7 wayland x11; do sudo snap connect authy:$iface system; done sudo snap connect authy:gnome-3-28-1804 gnome-3-28-1804 sudo snap connect au

[Bug 1943853] Re: Recent update DELETED SNAP PROGRAMS

2021-09-17 Thread Maciej Borzecki
This doesn't look right. Can you attach the output of `snap changes`. If there is a change that has an error status, can you also attach the output `snap change ` for each one? IDs are in the leftmost column in snap changes output. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1943853] Re: Recent update DELETED SNAP PROGRAMS

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Can you attach the output of `snap connections` and `snap list` commands? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943853 Title: Recent update DELETED SNAP PROGRAMS To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1932579] Re: snap pt_BR locale shows warning every time

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
We also have a change in snapd source code that will no longer show these messages: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10756 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932579 Title: snap pt_

[Bug 1920754] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in hirsute

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920754 Title: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure in hirsute To manage notificati

[Bug 1926705] Re: insInconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-machine.h: 541: elf_machine_rela_relative: Assertion `ELFW(R_TYPE) (reloc->r_info) == R_X86_64_RELATIVE' failed!

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
I do not see this problem with snapd-2.49.2+20.04 installed from the archive. Please check on you system after running an update. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 1925810] Re: Bashism in snapd.sh (aka apps-in-path.sh) breaks dash

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925810 Title: Bashism in snapd.sh (aka apps-in-path.sh) breaks dash To mana

[Bug 1935701] Re: package snapd 2.48.3+20.04 failed to install/upgrade: installed snapd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
Waiting until unit snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d34\x2d1804-66.mount is stopped [attempt 19] Running in chroot, ignoring request: is-active Waiting until unit snap-gnome\x2d3\x2d34\x2d1804-66.mount is stopped [attempt 20] Running in chroot, ignoring request: is-active Removing snap gnome-3-34-1804 and revis

[Bug 1938897] Re: snapd 2.51.1+21.10 autotest segfault on ppc64

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
segfault happens in `go tool compile` process ** Also affects: golang (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1943008] Re: snapd autopkgtest smoke/sandbox failure on impish

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
AFAIU the extra line in the output (libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work) appears when mksquashfs is invoked as squashfs- tools is missing a dependency on libgc-s1 (previously libgcc1). ** Also affects: squashfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** C

[Bug 1889067] Re: Error logging in snapd: (most recent call last): (snapd-error-quark, 10) when trying to log in from settings

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889067 Title: Error logging in snapd: (most recent call last): (snapd-error-quark, 10) wh

[Bug 1889318] Re: install chromium in lxc container for 20.04 fails

2021-09-16 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889318 Title: install chromium in lxc container for 20.04 fails To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1930179] Re: Advantech CAN driver not recognized in Ubuntu Core 20

2021-05-31 Thread Maciej Borzecki
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930179 Title: Advantech CAN driver not recognized in Ubuntu Core 20 To man

  1   2   3   >