[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-06-03 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:4.0.2-0ubuntu5 --- libreoffice (1:4.0.2-0ubuntu5) saucy; urgency=low * Add libcommons-logging-java BD, to work around brokenness when doing an arch build. -- Iain LaneFri, 31 May 2013 23:24:52 +0100 ** Changed in: libreoffi

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-27 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Discussed this with seb128: - as upstream 4.1 doesnt exhibit this breaker - LibreOffice beta1 is out and beta2 will follow soon, instead of bisecting the fix for backporting, just go directly for uploading beta2 in saucy and simply disable this test in the 4.0 package. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-27 Thread Björn Michaelsen
eh, 14 step not 16 step. Not that it makes much of a difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182170 Title: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-27 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Test failure is: REPRODUCIBLE even with --without-system-boost NOT REPRODUCABLE on libreoffice master@28f2af669f01cd304994f1907de0b61245b3d37a (CommitDate: Sun May 26 15:14:07 2013 +0100) However, I unfortunately find no obvious commit responsible for the fix. git rev-list --count libreoffice-4

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-24 Thread Björn Michaelsen
so to further triage this one down to this interface test: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/qadevOOo/tests/java/ifc/xml/sax/_XDocumentHandler.java and of that, the startDocument test is enough to trigger the problem on teardown. In SwXMLImport::startDocument it seems the first line tri

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-23 Thread Björn Michaelsen
I build that and can reproduce the test failure, which is a crasher to make things more interesting. Triaged it down to the sw.XMLImporter test in sw/qa/unoapi/sw.sce, which is the testcode at: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=blob;f=qadevOOo/tests/java/mod/_sw/XMLImporter.java;h

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-23 Thread Björn Michaelsen
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182170 Title: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Yeah, my bits are at: dget http://people.canonical.com/~xnox/repo/libreoffice_4.0.2-0ubuntu2.dsc Please note the hsqldb transition / new upstream release is in saucy- proposed now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-23 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Taking over from xnox, found his state of work at http://people.canonical.com/~xnox/repo/ ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-22 Thread Björn Michaelsen
@xnox: Are you tweaking on the toolchain update right now? Is your current workstate public somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182170 Title: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy To man

[Bug 1182170] Re: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy

2013-05-20 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182170 Title: libreoffice FTBFS in saucy To manage notifications about this bug g