[Bug 1546967] Re: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

2018-04-05 Thread Iain Lane
Same for release - please update & re-subscribe if/when this is active again -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546967 Title: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

[Bug 1546967] Re: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

2016-07-01 Thread Martin Pitt
Unsubscribing sponsors, this still looks incomplete. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546967 Title: [needs-packaging] linux

[Bug 1546967] Re: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

2016-05-17 Thread Mathew Hodson
** Summary changed: - [FFe] [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages + [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1546967] Re: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

2016-02-18 Thread Anthony Wong
** Description changed: There used to be linux-backports-modules packages in Ubuntu maintained by our kernel team before Quantal (the last release that have these packages is Precise). However these packages proved to be useful in our OEM projects, because we often need to support new

[Bug 1546967] Re: [needs-packaging] linux backports and related meta packages

2016-02-18 Thread Anthony Wong
** Description changed: There used to be linux-backports-modules packages in Ubuntu maintained by our kernel team before Quantal (the last release that have these packages is Precise). However these packages proved to be useful in our - OEM projects and so I would like to re-introduce them