Sorry for the late response.
This is not a conflict. The library package is usually installed
automatically as a dependency of some other package, not manually. So
when all reverse dependencies are update to use the new library package
name, the package manager will remove the old library and inst
Thanks Dmitry, I did so. I know this is a development version of Ubuntu and
rough edges like are to normal, but can't this transition be done without
conflict in package management? Is there a general document describing the GCC5
transition and the future of *v5 packages, aside from these two [1
The name was changed back to libdouble-conversion1.
So please choose the second variant.
This is not a bug, so closing.
** Changed in: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: double-conversion
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug not
