The openarena benchmarks are worse again in Ubuntu 10.04:
with compiz on: ~175 fps
with compiz off: ~215 fps
Compare this with Hardy, ~450 fps, and Intrepid, ~250 fps, both with
compiz running.
I've tried with nvidia 195.36.15 and 195.36.24.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: intrepid
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
With the 185.18.14 driver on the 2.6.30-10-generic kernel in Jaunty, the
openarena benchmark has improved to around 300 fps in the openarena
benchmark. This is still well below the 450 in the
Hardy/Intrepid/173.14.12 combination, although to be fair I couldn't
reproduce these results last time I tr
I've posted a new version of the -nvidia driver to our xorg-edgers PPA,
would you mind testing it either on Jaunty or Karmic and see if it
resolves this bug?
Get nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 - 185.18.14 here:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-
2.6.30.rc5 has even better framerates than 2.6.30.rc3.
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
It's slightly faster still with kernel 2.6.30.rc3, maybe 10% better
frame rate in COD4.
What _does_ seem to be an issue with both 2.6.28 and 2.6.30 that wasn't
present in earlier kernels is that often the game will run fast but then
'stutter' - fps drops right down - and then recover again. This d
With nvidia 185.18.04, I get a fairly consistent 280 fps in openarena,
but I get much better performance from wine/COD4 - eg at the beginning
of 'War Pig' I get 20-35 fps, which is comparable to Hardy.
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I just ran the openarena benchmark test with Jaunty and got 265-300 fps
over five attempts, which is slightly faster than Intrepid but still
much slower than Hardy. compiz doesn't seem to make any difference.
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: compiz
glxgears shows the following fps on my Nvidia 8600GT card when compiz is
running:
173.14.12 driver:
Hardy, 32 bit: 4900 fps
Hardy, 64 bit: 5000 fps
Intrepid, 32 bit: 4200 fps
177.80 driver:
Intrepid, 32 bit:
[This is an automated message]
In Jaunty (9.04), we have just updated to the latest
nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 package from nVidia, version 180.44.
This package provides fixes for a large number of bugs, and we need your
assistance in testing if it fixes the issue you reported.
To do this, ple
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22497664/Xorg.0.log
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "lspci"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22497714/lspci
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22497614/xorg.conf
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
I get the similar openarena-benchmark results with nvidia 180.27 on
Jaunty alpha 4 as I did in Intrepid, ie 230-280 fps compared to Hardy's
much faster 435 fps average.
Call of Duty 4 runs the same as in Intrepid, ie compiz sometimes slows
it down and sometimes doesn't (but when not slowed down it
[This is an automated message]
In Jaunty (9.04), we are dropping the nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 package, which
is now superseded by then nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 package.
http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-180
To transition your bug into the new package, we n
I think compiz might actually be a problem now. Using both 2.6.27-11 and
2.6.28-4 with compiz 1:0.7.8-0ubuntu4.1, I often get significantly
reduced 3d performance (ie halved) - but not always - in CoD4 compared
to when compiz is disabled. Sometimes restarting compiz fixes it, other
times not.
I'm
I'm removing the COD4 benchmark results. I discovered that the Hardy
64bit had a lot of native Windows DLLs installed in its .wine folder:
copying this .wine folder across to Intrepid sped up the fps to similar
speeds as Hardy was getting (I'm using nvidia 180.08, but it was giving
the same results
Update: I'm still getting slow 3D with the latest 177.82 drivers.
--
nvidia 3D/compiz performance is greatly reduced in Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
I think I have a different problem from that bug. nvidia-settings says
that PowerMizer is set at performance level 2 (maximum performance),
even at idle (475MHz/702MHz). Compiz runs nice and fast with both
173.14.12 and 177.80 - it's only when running these games that I notice
the big drop in fps.
Are you having this bug?
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=120794
I have a GeForce 9600M GT, updated Intrepid, and Compiz seems very slow (slows
opening menus, slow workspace changes, slow expose effect, and I'm using Normal
compiz effects). Running glxgears with the nVidia Server
Moving to the (two) nvidia-glx driver packages. This isn't (directly)
going to be a problem with Xserver 1.5, because the nvidia drivers don't
actually use any of the X server's GL stack (although it might be lack
of optimisation against the new X server ABI or somesuch).
Further debugging at thi
Using Call of Duty 4 running under wine 1.1.7 as a benchmark, both
173.14.12 and 177.80 are much slower than Hardy with 173.14.12.
Intrepid only manages 10-13 fps (at the start of the 'War Pig' level)
with either driver, while Hardy gets around 28-30 fps, ie over double
the rate. This is running i
I've confirmed the large difference between 173.14.12 and 177.80 drivers
using the the OpenArena benchmark (both on amd64 installations with
compiz running):
Intrepid, 177.80:
840 frames 3.1 seconds 267.9 fps 1.0/3.7/20.0/2.0 ms
840 frames 3.3 seconds 254.5 fps 2.0/3.9/33.0/1.9 ms
840 frames 3.4
23 matches
Mail list logo
