Patch does not directly apply to 6.12.2 codebase. We'll pull the fix in
when we update -ati to latest in karmic.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
** Summary changed:
- [RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
+ [RS690] (Needs new
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-driver-ati
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Fixed upstream in http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-
ati/commit/?id=e01b8dc827ce1913927e1a4fad05a99a2dd9e805
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Excellent. Thanks for reporting and testing upstream.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Package changed: xorg-server (Ubuntu) = xserver-xorg-video-ati
(Ubuntu)
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21521
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21521
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-driver-ati via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21521
Importance:
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log (with radeon 6.12.2-0ubuntu1~xup~1)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26251546/Xorg.0.log
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-driver-ati
Status: Unknown = Confirmed
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Section Screen
Identifier Screen
Device Device
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier Device
Driver radeon
Option IgnoreEDID true
Option NoDDC true
EndSection
Section Monitor
Identifier HDMI-0
Option Enable false
# Option Ignore
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log without the sync-lines
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24413094/Xorg.0.log.orig
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Sorry, I didn't have time to investigate further (except that adding the
lines you wrote didn't help). fglrx worked fine so I didn't have to work
on this issue.
Until today I upgraded to jaunty where fglrx is obiously broken. Bad
news: After I removed every trace of fglrx from my system, both
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log with the sync-lines
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24413105/Xorg.0.log
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I must correct myself: radeonhd works fine, only the radeon driver
fails.
I originally first removed the fglrx driver, rebooted, radeonhd was
autoselected (and failed), uninstalled radeonhd and while doing so
noticed that I forgot to remove some fglrx-mesa-stuff. After removing
both packages I
We're closing this bug since it is has been some time with no response from the
original reporter. However, if the issue still exists please feel free to
reopen with the requested information. Also, if you could, please test against
the latest development version of Ubuntu, since this
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xrandr
I've got a Nokia 800 Pro+ monitor here, connected via DVI (with a PD
adapter). It is autoconfigured at a resolution of 1152x864 even though
the native resolution is 1280x1024. The latter is also reported both by
ddcprobe and
Hmm, you're right that it's interesting that the resolution is being
detected differently by each of the three drivers, and the inconsistency
may indeed point to some sort of issue with -ati; I'll upstream it to
them for that reason.
However, from your description it seems that none of the
Notice how the h/v rates don't match the vendor's advertised
capabilities:
Via EDID:
HorizSync 31-65
VertRefresh 58-62
Via DDC:
monitorrange: 31-65, 58-62
Xorg.0.log (radeonhd):
(II) RADEONHD(0): Ranges: V min: 58 V max: 62 Hz, H min: 31 H max: 65 kHz,
PixClock max 110 MHz
Advertised
** Summary changed:
- Wrong resolution with RS690 and Nokia 800 Pro+
+ [RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
--
[RS690] Wrong resolution and Nokia 800 Pro+
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298094
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
17 matches
Mail list logo
