** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: brasero
Since no clear reason was added in the changelog, I believe that
"Conflicts: nautilus-cd-burner" was added due to this announcement:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/devel-announce-
list/2009-January/msg6.html
Namely, brasero
You're right, I did go through the debian policy - I thought it was an
ubuntu policy (but couldn't find it), sorry. :)
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Policy violation - Conflicts: nautilus-cd-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
Don't say "is regarded as a policy violation" without providing a
citation from the policy manual! I believe that Scott's comment on IRC
was mistaken: I know of no provision in policy forbidding Conflicts
between packages that don't share
18 matches
Mail list logo