[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package cyrus-sasl2 - 2.1.25.dfsg1-6ubuntu0.1 --- cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.25.dfsg1-6ubuntu0.1) raring-security; urgency=low * SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service via invalid salt (LP: #1187001) - debian/patches/CVE-2013-4122.patch: properly handle glibc

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package cyrus-sasl2 - 2.1.25.dfsg1-6ubuntu0.1 --- cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.25.dfsg1-6ubuntu0.1) raring-security; urgency=low * SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service via invalid salt (LP: #1187001) - debian/patches/CVE-2013-4122.patch: properly handle glibc

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-07 Thread Marc Deslauriers
This issue only affects Raring and newer. Already fixed in saucy. ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Quantal)

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-07 Thread Marc Deslauriers
This issue only affects Raring and newer. Already fixed in saucy. ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu Quantal)

Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread HappyCamper
On 02/10/2013 08:09, Seth Arnold wrote: Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread mancha
Hi. This issue was assigned CVE-2013-4122: http://openwall.com/lists /oss-security/2013/07/13/1 --mancha ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-4122 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread mancha
I just updated the upstream bugzilla report to reflect the CVE assignment and link my point release patches. https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/ #3803 http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread Seth Arnold
Mancha, thanks! I'm sorry I overlooked it. (Even worse, I did the triage way back when I forgot about it in the meantime: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2013/CVE-2013-4122.html ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread HappyCamper
On 02/10/2013 08:09, Seth Arnold wrote: Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread mancha
Hi. This issue was assigned CVE-2013-4122: http://openwall.com/lists /oss-security/2013/07/13/1 --mancha ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2013-4122 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread mancha
I just updated the upstream bugzilla report to reflect the CVE assignment and link my point release patches. https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/ #3803 http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3803 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-04 Thread Seth Arnold
Mancha, thanks! I'm sorry I overlooked it. (Even worse, I did the triage way back when I forgot about it in the meantime: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2013/CVE-2013-4122.html ) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-02 Thread Seth Arnold
Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I also see extensive use of fork(2) in the

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-02 Thread chud
I think default THREADS=5 in /etc/default/saslauthd, after these all crash [as above] then thats the end of SASL working. (at least that is what happened for me, repeatedly). Setting this to THREADS=0 has worked around the issue (for me anyway) as it makes it fork instead. -- You received

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-02 Thread Seth Arnold
Are you confident about multi-threading? I don't see any linker commands to link against the threading libraries in our build logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/92810645/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64 .cyrus-sasl2_2.1.25.dfsg1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz and I also see extensive use of fork(2) in the

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-02 Thread chud
I think default THREADS=5 in /etc/default/saslauthd, after these all crash [as above] then thats the end of SASL working. (at least that is what happened for me, repeatedly). Setting this to THREADS=0 has worked around the issue (for me anyway) as it makes it fork instead. -- You received

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread Seth Arnold
I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the service appears to be restarting without qualm, I can see why it didn't get a CVE, but this does seem less than awesome. Mancha made a lot of patches for

Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread HappyCamper
Hi Thanks. Also note the use of crypt() in a multithreaded application. Must be crypt_r(). CU, Arno Seth Arnold 1187...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread Seth Arnold
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread Seth Arnold
I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the service appears to be restarting without qualm, I can see why it didn't get a CVE, but this does seem less than awesome. Mancha made a lot of patches for

Re: [Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-10-01 Thread HappyCamper
Hi Thanks. Also note the use of crypt() in a multithreaded application. Must be crypt_r(). CU, Arno Seth Arnold 1187...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: I think this hasn't been addressed in part because it didn't get a CVE number: http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/07/12/4 Since the

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-08-16 Thread HappyCamper
BTW, shouldn't saslauthd use crypt_r(), it being a multi-threaded beasty? ;o) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-08-16 Thread HappyCamper
Hi all I can reproduce the problem when I run saslauthd with authmech shadow: saslauthd -a shadow and then try to authenticate users that have a crippled /etc/shadow entry. By crippled I mean ! or * as password entry, as for root, mail, nobody. When I run the 2.1.25 stock source with

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-08-16 Thread HappyCamper
Hi all I can reproduce the problem when I run saslauthd with authmech shadow: saslauthd -a shadow and then try to authenticate users that have a crippled /etc/shadow entry. By crippled I mean ! or * as password entry, as for root, mail, nobody. When I run the 2.1.25 stock source with

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-08-16 Thread HappyCamper
BTW, shouldn't saslauthd use crypt_r(), it being a multi-threaded beasty? ;o) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-06-13 Thread chud
if anyone else is suffering this I installed fail2ban as a workaround, the attacker's IP gets banned before SASL falls over. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-06-13 Thread chud
if anyone else is suffering this I installed fail2ban as a workaround, the attacker's IP gets banned before SASL falls over. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title:

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-06-04 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1187001] Re: saslauthd[26791]: segfault at 0 ip b71de6f1 sp bfcd2d9c error 4 in libc-2.17.so[b7160000+1ad000]

2013-06-04 Thread Yolanda Robla
** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187001 Title: