[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-23 Thread Jeffrey Baker
There's no reason to be hysterical, but a re-spin of Alpha 6 CDs without the e1000e module may be called for. This is a separate bug, but the recommended workaround of adding "blacklist e1000e" in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist doesn't work. Somehow, udev or some other thing manages to load it anyway.

[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-23 Thread abingham
It's been almost a day since discussion on this issue resumed. The Alpha 6 image are still up with no warning present. I always assume that an Alpha or Beta release may break things to where I need to reinstall the OS. Battery life could be bad. Etc. But this is literally capable of *destroyin

[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-23 Thread Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen
>http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/intrepid/alpha6 No warning >http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/intrepid/alpha-6/ No warning >http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/intrepid/alpha-6/intrepid- desktop-i386.iso Download works. How many people test these iso's? How many of them are using an intel mot

[Bug 263555] Re: [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk

2008-09-23 Thread Chris Jones
** Summary changed: - [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e kernel places Intel gigE chipsets at risk + [intrepid] 2.6.27 e1000e driver places Intel ICH8 and ICH9 gigE chipsets at risk ** Description changed: - The e1000e driver in 2.6.27 (not tested with 2.6.26, but it was absolutely fine with whatever dr

<    1   2   3