[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2012-07-31 Thread Fabien Lusseau
I also think this bug to be relevant, we already have 32bits only archivers. Arc files are becoming more and more common. Freearc is working well on Linux but is not packaged. I use freearc a lot (with wine because it's the fastest and easiest way to install it nowadays). Even on 32 bits it's way

[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2011-10-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471 Title: [needs-packag

[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-18 Thread thometal
I think its relevant because it doesnt exist a 32bit package or a 64bit package with 32bit depiences there is nothing -- [needs-packaging] FreeArc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-18 Thread Diaa Sami
I don't think this bug is relevant because the author of FreeArc explicity says that a 64-bit version is a to be done in the future, so it's not a packaging issue, the source-code needs to be modified -- [needs-packaging] FreeArc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473471 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 473471] Re: [needs-packaging] FreeArc

2009-11-04 Thread Brian Murray
*** This is an automated message *** This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs- packaging bug reports have