2011-03-01 19:50:12 INFOOverride Component to: 'main'
2011-03-01 19:50:21 INFO'xserver-xorg-video-qxl -
0.0.12-1ubuntu3/universe/x11' source overridden
2011-03-01 19:50:21 INFO
'xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.12-1ubuntu3/universe/x11/OPTIONAL' binary
overridden in natty/amd64
2011-03-01
Kees, can you look at this?
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Kees Cook (kees)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709537
Title:
[MIR]
I might like to see the use of debian/clean instead of all the rm -f's
in debian/rules, but overall, this package looks okay to me. If RAOF is
managing the ABI, that's perfect. +1
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in:
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-qxl (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709537
Title:
[MIR] xserver-xorg-video-qxl
--
ubuntu-bugs
The X server video ABI isn't *terribly* fragile. The ABI change patches
that I've done have been relatively simple affairs, and this will have
the advantage that I could actually test it!
I expect the ABI maintenance to be an annoying, but supportable, cost.
--
You received this bug
Sarvatt raised one maintenance issue is that RedHat is slow at updating
it for ABI changes in xserver. If we include it in -video-all this
would hold back xserver transitions since it won't build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Subbing RAOF; since he fixed an ABI issue once before, it would be worth
getting his thoughts on the feasibility of this before making a
decision.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709537
