[Bug 410357] Re: please install rscreen as /usr/bin/rscreen

2011-07-24 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: autossh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: autossh (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410357

Re: [Bug 839492] Re: xen-blkfront module missing from initramfs, Ubuntu as DomU can't boot

2011-09-15 Thread Axel Beckert
try to use those instead. Will also check later... Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517 B7

[Bug 852494] [NEW] Uninstallable on armel

2011-09-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Public bug reported: usb-creator (0.2.28.3) is uninstallable on Ubuntu Natty armel due to its dependency on syslinux which seems unavailable on armel. This makes the howto on http://www.ubuntu.com/download/ubuntu/download a farce, especially since this page is missing a howto for Non-Ubuntu Linuxe

Re: [Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-01-26 Thread Axel Beckert
ze, as factor * RAM CONF_SWAPSIZE="`echo "${MEMSIZE} ${CONF_SWAPFACTOR} * p q" | dc`" # remove any fractional MBytes CONF_SWAPSIZE="`echo "${CONF_SWAPSIZE}" | cut -f 1 -d '.'`" Regards, Axel -- ,''`.

Re: [Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-01-27 Thread Axel Beckert
And I'm fine with RPN and dc, too. :) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-| 4096R: 2517

[Bug 673209] Re: Cannot install on maverick

2011-02-09 Thread Axel Beckert
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 654504 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/654504 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 654504 eeepc-acpi-scripts depends acpi-support-base * You can subscribe to bug 654504 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eeepc

[Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-02-11 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: dphys-swapfile (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706764 Title: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size -- ubuntu-bugs ma

[Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-02-11 Thread Axel Beckert
I just uploaded 20061020-4 to Debian Unstable which fixes specifically the magnitude issue. ** Tags added: fixed-in-debian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706764 Title: dphys-swapfile

[Bug 647645] Re: FTBFS

2010-12-13 Thread Axel Beckert
JFTR: The mentioned bug is just the blocker for the FTBFS, but the according Debian Bug itself is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574299 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #574299 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574299 -- You received this bug notificati

[Bug 601452] Re: Unable to edit Cookie Permissions

2011-02-13 Thread Axel Beckert
Oh, one more question: Do you have the package conkeror-spawn-process- helper installed, too? That one is needed for the external editor functionality... ** Tags added: moreinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 288974] Re: routines in src/pro/ not included by default

2011-02-15 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: gnudatalanguage (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288974 Title: routines in src/pro/ not included by default -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 72054] Re: package defaults are unfriendly for users that use the 'viins' editing mode

2011-02-15 Thread Axel Beckert
JFTR: The according Debian bug has been tagged and closed as wontfix. Seems as if fixing this for vi users would make all Emacs users unhappy for the very same reason. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 720069] Re: Please merge conkeror 0.9.3+git110213-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main)

2011-02-18 Thread Axel Beckert
JFTR: I'll soon upload a new snapshot to Debian Unstable which will add xulrunner-2.0 compatibility. If that's wanted for Ubuntu, you possibly should wait for that one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 784705] [NEW] 32-bit version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Public bug reported: A user of us ran into this on his locally managed Ubuntu Natty i386 machine and I could reproduce it as follows: auriga:~# mkdir /mnt/tmp auriga:~# mount.cifs -o user=abe,rw,mand,uid=abe,gid=isg //unixdata/isg /mnt/tmp Password: auriga:~# su - abe U !514 Z1 ?0 L1 abe@auriga:

[Bug 784705] Re: i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
** Summary changed: - 32-bit version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts + i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bu

[Bug 784705] Re: i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
** Description changed: A user of us ran into this on his locally managed Ubuntu Natty i386 machine and I could reproduce it as follows: auriga:~# mkdir /mnt/tmp auriga:~# mount.cifs -o user=abe,rw,mand,uid=abe,gid=isg //unixdata/isg /mnt/tmp - Password: + Password: auriga:~# su - a

[Bug 784705] Re: i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Some more details: Also happens with Kernel 2.6.32 from Debian Squeeze, i.e. it's not an issue of a recent kernel. Attached a diff of normalized strace output of: - gcc-4.5 -o test test.c - gcc-4.6 -o test test.c One difference between the two runs seems to be that test.c is opened with O_LA

[Bug 784705] Re: i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-19 Thread Axel Beckert
Just a short comment: Looks the Samba version on the server side is also relevant: If the Samba server is Debian Squeeze (2:3.5.6~dfsg- 3squeeze2), the problem vanishes, too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

Re: [Bug 784705] Re: i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts

2011-05-19 Thread Axel Beckert
ear that it's not one but several bugs in several projects :-) At least as I suspected, O_LARGEFILE seems to be relevant. :-) With regards to replying, I just wanted to wait until they're visible in Launchpad, as I don't want to create an account in yet another Bugzilla.

Re: [Bug 756172] Re: netsurf version 2.1-2.1 failed to build on i386

2011-05-26 Thread Axel Beckert
e.g. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574299 Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `-

[Bug 756172] Re: netsurf version 2.1-2.1 failed to build on i386

2011-04-10 Thread Axel Beckert
Known in Debian for quite some time: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574299 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595828 AFAICS packaging a new upstream version would solve that issue, too, but would need packaging quite some new libraries, too. ** Bug watch added: De

[Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-01-24 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, this is a bug already fixed in newer versions of dphys-swapfile, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564466. The version in Maverick is already a fixed one. Maybe that fix should be backported to Lucid... The only difference between the above mentioned bug report in Debian fr

[Bug 706764] Re: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size

2011-01-24 Thread Axel Beckert
** Tags added: fixed-in-debian fixed-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706764 Title: dphys-swapfile sets incorrect swap size -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 538917] Re: xen-tools is neither available in lucid nor maverick

2010-10-06 Thread Axel Beckert
There is now a xen-tools PPA for lucid and maverick containing the current xen-tools stable release at https://launchpad.net/~xtaran/+archive/xen-tools/ HTH. -- xen-tools is neither available in lucid nor maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538917 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 289752] Re: excessive dependancies on links2

2010-07-14 Thread Axel Beckert
Ok, so in your view, links has too few dependencies and links2 too many dependencies? -- excessive dependancies on links2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 443391] Re: links missing www-browser alternative

2010-07-09 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: links2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: links2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Axel Beckert (xtaran) -- links missing www-browser alternative https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443391 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 289752] Re: excessive dependancies on links2

2010-07-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Just use the links package instead of links2 which has very few dependencies but is built from the same source. -- excessive dependancies on links2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289752 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 538912] Re: xlinks shouldn't replace Firefox as /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser

2010-07-09 Thread Axel Beckert
This is an Ubuntu specific bug. Iceweasel in Debian does have a priority of 70, xlinks2 a priority of 69. Works fine. Ubuntu's firefox-3.5 in Karmic has priority of 40. No idea, why Ubuntu uses a different priority for Firefox compared to Debian. This probably causes the same problem with many oth

[Bug 87122] Re: [needs-packaging] iFolder

2010-07-15 Thread Axel Beckert
Further related Debian bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/273303 (original ITP) http://bugs.debian.org/382667 (former RFP, already merged and retitled) http://bugs.debian.org/562980 (soon to be retitled and merged RFP) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #273303 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

[Bug 337377] Re: please restore netselect package: it's _not_ debian-specific

2010-09-12 Thread Axel Beckert
It would be even better if the netselect-apt package would be modified to use Ubuntu's list of mirrors instead of Debian's one. Then the netselect-apt package would be also useful in Ubuntu. -- please restore netselect package: it's _not_ debian-specific https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337377 You

[Bug 1098531] Re: Wrong path to global config files mentioned in man page

2020-02-16 Thread Axel Beckert
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098531 Title: Wrong path to global config files mentioned in man page To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 1098531] Re: Wrong path to global config files mentioned in man page

2020-02-16 Thread Axel Beckert
This has been fixed in 5.2-3ubuntu1 (i.e. with Yakkety) when these ubuntu-specific changes were dropped: * Drop yodl from Build-Depends. * prebuild docs. ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Where can I get these linux-*-5.0.0-1.2 packages for debugging this issue? Can't find them in a standard disco pbuilder chroot. And unfortunately the above download links don't seem to contain relevant artifacts like the DKMS build log. ** Changed in: iptables-netflow (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
I think I found them at https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel- team/+archive/ubuntu/unstable ** Changed in: iptables-netflow (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Changed in: iptables-netflow (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Attached a dkms.log from iptables-netflows-dkms 2.3-5 building against linux-headers-5.0.0-3-generic and linux-libc-dev version 5.0.0-3.4. Will report this issue to upstream. ** Attachment added: "dkms.log of building against linux 5.0.0-3.4" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Forwarded to upstream at https://github.com/aabc/ipt-netflow/issues/108 ** Bug watch added: github.com/aabc/ipt-netflow/issues #108 https://github.com/aabc/ipt-netflow/issues/108 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-07 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: iptables-netflow (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Axel Beckert (xtaran) ** Changed in: iptables-netflow (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1813061] Re: iptables-netflow 2.3-5 ADT test failure with linux 5.0.0-1.2

2019-02-07 Thread Axel Beckert
Pull-request at upstream (with commits from someone with a canonical.com e-mail address :-): https://github.com/aabc/ipt-netflow/pull/110 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813061 Title:

[Bug 1851925] Re: Fresh install of aptitude is broken - missing dependency?

2019-11-09 Thread Axel Beckert
I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce this issue in a clean 18.04 chroot: aptitude is installed at version 0.8.10-6ubuntu1, too, and has a dependency on libsigc++-2.0-0v5 (version 2.10.0-2 installed as in your case) which contains /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0. And aptitude works for me.

[Bug 1851925] Re: Fresh install of aptitude is broken - missing dependency?

2019-11-09 Thread Axel Beckert
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851925 Title: Fresh install of aptitude is broken - missing dependency? To manag

Re: [Bug 1851925] Re: Fresh install of aptitude is broken - missing dependency?

2019-11-10 Thread Axel Beckert
Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 `-| 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE -- Y

[Bug 1959485] Re: reproducible crash in jammy

2022-01-29 Thread Axel Beckert
If you can still reproduce this, can you run "aptitude-create-state- bundle lp-1959485-crash-dist-upgrade.tbz2" and send me the resulting tar ball? (You probably need to upload the tar-ball somewhere as these can have a size around several hundred megabytes. Not sure if Launchpad can host such big

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2021-11-28 Thread Axel Beckert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #18 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18 ** Also affects: zsh (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1860323] Re: fping not working if ipv6 is disabled

2022-02-06 Thread Axel Beckert
Closing as fix-released since the fix should now be also in the most recent Ubuntu LTS version (i.e. Ubuntu 20.04 LTS). ** Changed in: fping (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. h

[Bug 1960727] Re: When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

2022-02-12 Thread Axel Beckert
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960727 Title: When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason To manage n

[Bug 1960842] Re: failed to load module `zsh/mathfunc': /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6

2022-02-14 Thread Axel Beckert
Seems to be an Ubuntu-only issue. Can't reproduce on Debian Unstable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960842 Title: failed to load module `zsh/mathfunc': /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so

[Bug 1960842] Re: failed to load module `zsh/mathfunc': /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6

2022-02-16 Thread Axel Beckert
@crashbit-gmail: There was no update of zsh in Jammy so far. If an update fixed this, it was not in zsh but maybe in a library. And indeed, one day after this bug report, glibc 2.35 (as mentioned in the missing symbol) got uploaded to jammy as well: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.35-0

[Bug 1963276] Re: Qutebrowser not launching on arm64

2022-03-03 Thread Axel Beckert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #960384 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960384 ** Also affects: qutebrowser (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960384 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 1963276] Re: Qutebrowser not launching on arm64

2022-03-03 Thread Axel Beckert
@alecos85: "No solution" is not true. That bug has been closed by the reporter that upgrading qutebrowser to a more recent version has solved the issue. (Although I suspect that actually an Qt upgrade in the same timeframe was the real reason for this being fixed. See upstream's comment in that bug

Re: [Bug 1963276] Re: Qutebrowser not launching on arm64

2022-03-04 Thread Axel Beckert
;ll post a bug report on qutebrowser's page. Could help as well although I suspect that he will ask to try out falkon as well. But maybe he knows a workaround (in case it's indeed a Qt issue). Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~a

<    2   3   4   5   6   7