On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:18 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:12 -0400, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya
> > wrote:
> > >> How would this affect application authors, would they need to go update
> > >> again?
> > >>
> > > what do you mea
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 21:10 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 15:32, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >
> > About putting it in GTK, I don't know of all the appindicators patches,
> > but most of the ones I've seen, more or less, are just a bunch of:
> >
> > #ifdef INDICATORS
> > app_indicator_wh
On 7 April 2011 15:32, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> About putting it in GTK, I don't know of all the appindicators patches,
> but most of the ones I've seen, more or less, are just a bunch of:
>
> #ifdef INDICATORS
> app_indicator_whatever...
> #else
> gtk_status_icon_whatever...
> #endif
>
Only FYI,
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:12 -0400, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya
> wrote:
> >> How would this affect application authors, would they need to go update
> >> again?
> >>
> > what do you mean?
>
> Basically do we have to go from app to app adjusting them aga
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>> How would this affect application authors, would they need to go update
>> again?
>>
> what do you mean?
Basically do we have to go from app to app adjusting them again or is
this a change we can do in one place?
--
ubuntu-desktop mailing
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 20:26 -0400, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
> >> Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators ones are
> >> duplicated in lots of packages, so it would be good if we could find a
> >> better way to make upstream apps use them, like, for instance, patching
> >> gtk_status
>> Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators ones are
>> duplicated in lots of packages, so it would be good if we could find a
>> better way to make upstream apps use them, like, for instance, patching
>> gtk_status_icon_* in GTK itself to use the indicators when available,
>> ins
On 04/07/2011 09:23 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> Priority: medium?
>
> While working on the GNOME3 PPA during this cycle, I found we have a lot
> of patches in many packages, which makes things harder when upgrading to
> major versions, and also introduces new ways for the apps to fail, as
> the fixes
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:30 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya
> wrote:
> [...]
> > So, for next cycle, I would suggest a "small" goal of trying to do patch
> > upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
>
> Great idea :)
>
>
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
[...]
> So, for next cycle, I would suggest a "small" goal of trying to do patch
> upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
Great idea :)
> Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators ones are
> duplicated i
Priority: medium?
While working on the GNOME3 PPA during this cycle, I found we have a lot
of patches in many packages, which makes things harder when upgrading to
major versions, and also introduces new ways for the apps to fail, as
the fixes are rebased to apply to the new upstream version.
Whi
11 matches
Mail list logo
