Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-22 Thread Tony Espy
On 04/22/2011 10:27 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:06 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop desig

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-22 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:06 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > >> On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: > >>> Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. > >>> > >>> ==

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Espy
On 04/21/2011 11:49 AM, Ted Gould wrote: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. == Currently Ubuntu contains two separate

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-21 Thread Ted Gould
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 11:34 -0400, Tony Espy wrote: > On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: > > Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. > > > > == > > > > Currently Ubuntu contains two separate sleep functions, suspend

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Espy
On 04/19/2011 08:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. == Currently Ubuntu contains two separate sleep functions, suspend and hibernate. This choice confuses users and is a un-necessary comp

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-20 Thread Didier Roche
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 17:38 +1000, Christopher James Halse Rogers a écrit : > > I think that reliability will be the determining factor in whether this > is usable or not. This behaviour would be a win if I don't have to > worry that hibernate's not going to work - or that my laptop's going

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-20 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:17 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jason Warner > wrote: > [...] > > 'sleep', the computer should both suspend and hibernate simultaneously. The > > computer remains suspended for a set period of time (e.g. 30min) or until > > the

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-19 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Jason Warner wrote: [...] > 'sleep', the computer should both suspend and hibernate simultaneously.  The > computer remains suspended for a set period of time (e.g. 30min) or until > the battery charge falls below a set level.  At the point the suspend state > is d

Re: [Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-19 Thread Jeremy Bicha
n 19 April 2011 20:09, Jason Warner wrote: > Currently Ubuntu contains two separate sleep functions, suspend and > hibernate.  This choice confuses users and is a un-necessary complication to > 'sleeping' the computer.  The proposed change is to combine both 'suspend' > and 'hibernate' into a sing

[Oneiric-Topic] Simplifying system sleep functions

2011-04-19 Thread Jason Warner
Hi Everyone - Sending this on behalf of John Lea, desktop design lead. == Currently Ubuntu contains two separate sleep functions, suspend and hibernate. This choice confuses users and is a un-necessary complication to 'sleeping' the computer. The prop