On 04/12/2011 05:31 AM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 00:23, Robert Ancell wrote:
>
>> Can we get all our CD applications using GTK3? I'm thinking of Firefox
>> here, we really don't want to have one or two applications requiring
>> both packages on the CD..
> FYI: Firefox GTK+3 port: ht
On 8 April 2011 00:23, Robert Ancell wrote:
> Can we get all our CD applications using GTK3? I'm thinking of Firefox
> here, we really don't want to have one or two applications requiring
> both packages on the CD..
FYI: Firefox GTK+3 port: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627699
-
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:21 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The idea was never really dropped but it's not likely it will be an
> > official focus for the team, contributions to help getting it working
> > better ar
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 09:12 +1000, Robert Ancell wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> > GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> > the following particular chall
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:10 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 17:00 +0530, Vishnoo a écrit :
> > Is Getting GNOME3 really worth it? GTK3 maybe for the parts which are
> > required for Unity..
>
> Yes, we need to move away from old unmaintained and deprecated
> technology f
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> the following particular challenges:
>
> * Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about rem
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> the following particular challenges:
>
> * Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about rem
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
> > Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
> > session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
> > applications to look and beh
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> * Discuss GTK3 theming with UX/design. Our current murrine based
>Humanity theme doesn't work with GTK3.
s/Humanity theme/Ambiance theme or Radiance theme. :-)
Humanity is an icon theme..
Or maybe you were thinking abo
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 17:00 +0530, Vishnoo a écrit :
> Is Getting GNOME3 really worth it? GTK3 maybe for the parts which are
> required for Unity..
Yes, we need to move away from old unmaintained and deprecated
technology for their modern equivalent (gtk2 to gtk3, gconf to dconf,
dbus-glib to
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 13:32 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit :
> there was a gtk3-engines-murrine package in the GNOME3 PPA some weeks
> ago, IIRC, so maybe that's a good starting point to port our themes?
Hi,
That package was from when gtk3 was still use the old theming way, Cimi
started a new cs
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
> Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
> session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
> applications to look and behave as close as possible to what users get
> in other distributions
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 13:46 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >
> they are not removed, they are moved to another place, which is
> gnome-tweak-tool, available in the GNOME3 PPA
>
Oh! Yea, I've heard of that tweak tool but never tried it.
Maybe we should consider including the tweak-tool by default on
On 07/04/11 05:22, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
applications to look and behave as close as possible to what users get
in other distributions. [1] I know it's not a new
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 17:00 +0530, Vishnoo wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> > > kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> > > GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> the following particular challenges:
>
> * Review our patches, and be rather aggress
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> > kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> > GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> > the following particular chal
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
Hey
> kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> the following particular challenges:
>
> * Review our patches, and be rather aggr
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
> kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
> GNOME3. Aside from the obvious "update the package versions", I see
> the following particular challenges:
Hello,
(You stole my topic! ;-)
Joke aside we should do
19 matches
Mail list logo
