Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2011, 12:47 -0500 schrieb Micah Gersten: > On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 > > Build OK - synced from Debian testing. > > Until we can sponsor syncs through the LP API [1], and as long as > there's no

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: > It's a check on upload and not during the build would be my guess.  Maybe we > should add a lintian warning/error if it uses .xz debs w/out the Speaking of Lintian warnings, would it make sense to have lintian duplicate the original .gz, com

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:45:23PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > But this makes me think of another question: why didn't the Debian package > have that same Pre-Depends. Extrapolating from Steve's explanation, my > guess is that they don't have the same distro-version restriction setup > that we d

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

Hi Barry (2011.10.25_22:45:23_+0200) > But this makes me think of another question: why didn't the Debian package > have that same Pre-Depends. Extrapolating from Steve's explanation, my guess > is that they don't have the same distro-version restriction setup that we do > (i.e. outside the chroot

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

Thanks Micah and Steve for the great explanations. On Oct 25, 2011, at 03:18 PM, Micah Gersten wrote: >It's a check on upload and not during the build would be my guess. >Maybe we should add a lintian warning/error if it uses .xz debs w/out >the pre-depends. I think that could help, but it's al

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:15:06PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > However, when the buildd got to that point, it failed: > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/83677349/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-amd64.m2crypto_0.21.1-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz I think you probably mean this error: chroot-autobuild/build/bui

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On 10/25/2011 03:15 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > >> It should now be possible to use xz compression for .deb packages >> uploaded to Ubuntu oneiric (using 'dh_builddeb -- -Zxz'). In order to >> do so, you must include this field in the relevant bina

Re: data.tar.xz support added to Launchpad

On Aug 26, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Colin Watson wrote: >It should now be possible to use xz compression for .deb packages >uploaded to Ubuntu oneiric (using 'dh_builddeb -- -Zxz'). In order to >do so, you must include this field in the relevant binary packages: > > Pre-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.15.6) I ju

TIME CHANGE: Next ARB meeting is Friday Oct 28 at 18:00 UTC

Hi all, Per discussion with the other ARB members, ARB meetings have been moved to the last Friday of the month at 18:00 UTC. There will not be a meeting today. The next meeting is Friday, Oct 28 at 18:00 UTC. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[fre

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:26:58AM -0600, Steve Stalcup wrote: > Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept > private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no > need to be an ass about it. Speaking (I hope) for the ubuntu-devel moderation team, Micah

Re: Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

On 10/25/2011 07:19 AM, James Page wrote: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apcalc/+bug/880074 > Build OK - synced from Debian testing. Until we can sponsor syncs through the LP API [1], and as long as there's not an immediate need for the sync, we should probably just subscribe ubuntu-a

Why the "two step" recovery mode?

Hello everyone, I'd like to know the motivation behind the change made to the recovery mode in Oneiric. For those who don't know: selecting the '(recovery mode)' entry in GRUB now stops in a read-only mode with following menu: Recovery Menu (limited read-only menu) * resume Resume normal b

User interface defect: Keyboard settings preference pane

[The Ubuntu website says feature and policy discussions go here, so here goes.] In the "System Settings" control-panel thing, there is a preference pane called "Keyboard". The Keyboard preference pane has a "Typing" tab, which allows the user to set the delay and speed for key repeats when a key

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

Fixed Top Post... On 10/25/2011 11:26 AM, Steve Stalcup wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Micah Gersten > wrote: > >> On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low >>> >>> * Merge from debian unstable

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/25/2011 10:26 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Colin Watson wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: >>> We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird >>> debian naming thing >> >> On the co

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 26/10/2011 00:38, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Holbach > wrote: >> >> Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of >> these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might >> be different for others) would learn a

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > Personally I think it would be good for the project to discuss more of > these upload problems on the mailing list, as I personally (this might > be different for others) would learn a lot from them. > +1 here. Provided that everyone on

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Am 25.10.2011 18:26, schrieb Steve Stalcup: >> Once again Micah,  seems as if this message would have best been kept >> private between you and Nicolas.  We all know you're a smart dude, no >> need to be an ass about it. > > This tone is ab

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

Hello, Am 25.10.2011 18:26, schrieb Steve Stalcup: > Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept > private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no > need to be an ass about it. This tone is absolutely not necessary on the mailing list. Everybody els

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

Once again Micah, seems as if this message would have best been kept private between you and Nicolas. We all know you're a smart dude, no need to be an ass about it. With love, Steve On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrot

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

Sorry, i don't know how i missed that one :S, ok, just reverted the change. On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > > We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird > > debian naming thing >

Patch Pilot Report 2011-10-25

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 https://code.launchpad.net/~wibblymat/ubuntu/oneiric/couchdb/update-to-1.1.0/+merge/74236 Needs revising in light of new version of couchdb in Debian testing which should minimise the delta - commented with 'Needs Fixing' https://code.launchpad.n

Re: Patch Pilot report 2011/10/25

Hello Chris, Christopher James Halse Rogers [2011-10-25 18:51 +1100]: > The following merges require status changes: All done. Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) signature.asc Descriptio

Re: Google Code-in

On 23/10/11 21:47, Ted Gould wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 11:43 +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote: >> The tasks of admins will be: >> - having time to devote to the task from the beginning of November to >> the beginning of January >> - calling for / organizing ways to collect Debian "easy hacks",

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:25:58AM -0500, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird > debian naming thing On the contrary: libreadline-gplv2-dev | 5.2-11 | precise | amd64, armel, i386, powerpc I second Micah's reques

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

* Fixed top post On 10/25/2011 03:25 AM, Nicolas Valcárcel Scerpella wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: >>> aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low >>> >>> * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: >>> - d

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

We don't have that readline in our archive, i assume it's just a weird debian naming thing On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, Micah Gersten wrote: > On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: > > aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low > > > > * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining c

Patch Pilot report 2011/10/25

Mostly annoyed by the fact that only members of Ubuntu branches can change the status on merge proposals targetted at non-current releases, which meas we've got a bunch of merge proposals that are needlessly cluttering the sponsorship queue. This is apparently https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/

Re: [ubuntu/precise] aptsh 0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1 (Accepted)

On 10/25/2011 02:25 AM, Nicolas Valcarcel Scerpella wrote: > aptsh (0.0.7+nmu2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low > > * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: > - debian/control: change Build-Depends from libreadline5-dev to > libreadline-dev for readline transition. > > aptsh (0.0.7