On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Philip Muskovac wrote:
> > So do we want to eventually use that
> > for precise if it results in a less-buggy-by-default release?
>
> Depends on whether the bugs are not getting fixed in time :P
>
I am using
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:21 AM, bdfhjk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’m going to create Ubuntu Algorithms Team, which will be responsible for:
>
> * Helping developers in the implementation of the latest and hard to
> understand algorithms
> * Detection of ‘bottlenecks’ at boot time and during run time o
Hi Bhavani (2012.02.11_19:16:33_+0200)
> (CC'ing the devel list too for any inputs on the standard way of using
> syncpackage for sponsoring)
Use a newer syncpackage that supports native syncing:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2012-January/000923.html
If you want a sugges
Hi micah,stefano,daniel
I apologize that I sponsored couple of syncs locally and then I found
that it was automated through LP (since I was using syncpackage after
a long time for sponsoring) the bugs are
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcin/+bug/930509
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
Hello,
I’m going to create Ubuntu Algorithms Team, which will be responsible for:
* Helping developers in the implementation of the latest and hard to
understand algorithms
* Detection of ‘bottlenecks’ at boot time and during run time of Ubuntu and
coming up with ways to improve their
* Informing
