On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> > 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
> > As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point re
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
> As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a newer
> kernel and X stack by default for hardw
On 07/02/14 21:14, George DiceGeorge wrote:
*I'm trying to learn how to help with Xubuntu testing,*
*but i'm confused - at*
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker
where it says
[
SUMMARY SCREEN
version.png The picture above shows a single product (ubuntu) with 9
"mandatory" testc
I’m trying to learn how to help with Xubuntu testing,
but i’m confused - at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/QATracker
where it says
[
SUMMARY SCREEN
version.png The picture above shows a single product (ubuntu) with 9
"mandatory" testcases,
]
shouldnt there be a picture where it says
[version.pn
On 07/02/14 20:52, Richard Elkins wrote:
I should also add that the upgrade testing from 12.04.3 to
14.04.latest-at-that-time was rather pristine. I tried both an ISO
image upgrade and one via `update-manager -c -d`. Very predictable
and stable results. So, a bit of documentation word-smithi
On 07/02/14 22:47, Jay Torian wrote:
> Hello Elizabeth and others,
>
> I've been setting up a screen-casting setup and now have what I need.
>
> My current plan is to create some documentation videos based on the
> information in: http://docs.xubuntu.org/1310/
>
> The basic reason is some of this,
I should also add that the upgrade testing from 12.04.3 to
14.04.latest-at-that-time was rather pristine. I tried both an ISO
image upgrade and one via `update-manager -c -d`. Very predictable and
stable results. So, a bit of documentation word-smithing in the release
notes for 14.04 may be suff
On 07/02/14 19:33, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Michael Kellat
wrote:
FYI
How does this align with our planning?
If it goes as smoothly as past point releases, it would require us to
do testing of the ISOs but I don't think much else (unless we wan
Hello Elizabeth and others,
I've been setting up a screen-casting setup and now have what I need.
My current plan is to create some documentation videos based on the
information in: http://docs.xubuntu.org/1310/
The basic reason is some of this, and a few other topics I believe have a
high searc
12.04.4 ISO installation testing looks good from a test case perspective
(my experience). As stated below by Pasi, it would be possible to
handle 12.04.4 to "12.04.5" via package updates and leave it alone for
the most part.
So, I'd rather see effort put in the customer migration of 12.04.x to
14
If there is enough interest and motivation from the community (including
people who can actually help with the SRU), it can be discussed. As
Jackson, I don't personally think it as a realistic thing to do at the
moment either.
Pasi
On 07/02/14 22:03, Jackson Doak wrote:
> 4.12 will be difficult t
4.12 will be difficult to get to 14.04, let alone backporting it all the
way to precise
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Roberto J Dohnert
wrote:
> Aside from the trusty enablment stack, the only other compelling piece
> would be XFCE 4.12, which I cant seem to get a precise, no pun intended,
>
Aside from the trusty enablment stack, the only other compelling piece
would be XFCE 4.12, which I cant seem to get a precise, no pun intended,
release date. Releasing the trusty kernel through updates would be
optimal. Of course, we, the Black Lab Linux team, are supporting 12.04
for two yea
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Michael Kellat
wrote:
> FYI
>
> How does this align with our planning?
If it goes as smoothly as past point releases, it would require us to
do testing of the ISOs but I don't think much else (unless we want
to).
--
Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pl
If we don't need to update the ISO really, we can just release 12.04.5
as is, with the updates that have landed to Ubuntu core after .4. On the
other hand, if there is something we want in, it's another possibility
to get stuff in an ISO, not just updates.
I would note that there is only 1 year le
On 02/07/2014 11:00 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
+1
I don't think we can reasonably do anything else.
--
Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
sig
FYI
How does this align with our planning?
Stephen Michael Kellat
In the basement cafeteria on lunch
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Leann Ogasawara
> Date: February 7, 2014, 11:00:12 AM EST
> To: ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: [RFC] 12.04.5
>
> H
On 02/07/2014 09:00 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of
> having a 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
+1
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settin
Phew ... it's all a bit thick and fast at the moment ...
So following on from the other package testing we've been doing - it's
time for the next group of tests.
*XFCE Core *
You can find them in the same place as the others -
http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/306/builds/55
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:20:06AM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> >
> > With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> > 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
> FWIW, I think the engineering burden for d
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
FWIW, I think the engineering burden for doing this is worth the trade
off for it being The Right Thing To Do.
...
Hi All,
With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
12.04.5 point release for Precise.
As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a newer
kernel and X stack by default for hardware enablement purposes.
Maintainers of these enablement stacks
22 matches
Mail list logo
