Dear Jeremy I know ubuntu takes "only" 3.2 kernel when 3.3 is out, but there is
a main differences between kernel and gnome:
the major kernel bugs are backported into the older releases, with a SRU in 3.2
release cycle, so you don't have to worry about updates.
In gnome things are quite differen
Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more
usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty. I used it for several months
before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a
day in Natty. (Keep up the good work.) I can't speak to whether there
have been reg
On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
majority opinion, a
On 6 January 2012 10:41, James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>
> It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
> start button thing). Some of the things that drew me to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:41:21 +
James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>
> It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
On 5 January 2012 20:41, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Are you really plan to release ubuntu 12.04 without gnome 3.4 in the
> official repository?
>
> I mean, I can understand you prefere unity as default, but IMAO ubuntu
> should provide the latest gnome, like it provides the latest kernel relea
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
majority opinion, as far as I can tell) is that the On
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
start button thing). Some of the things that drew me to Natty have
gone.
It's not the first time that upgradi
Hi Martin
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> If you just need an upstream kernel, you can use
>
> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/
I fear I need a custom configuration and the preempt rt patchset
applied, and the kernel is supposed to run on lucid.
Christ
Hello Christoph,
Christoph Mathys [2012-01-06 9:29 +0100]:
> Which is the recommended way to build my own kernel from kernel.org
> source on ubuntu? I need header, kernel+modules and occasionally debug
> symbols.
If you just need an upstream kernel, you can use
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kerne
Which is the recommended way to build my own kernel from kernel.org
source on ubuntu? I need header, kernel+modules and occasionally debug
symbols.
The web is full of documentation about make-kpkg. There are a couple
of wiki pages for ubuntu that document how to rebuild the ubuntu
package for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
