Re: Move old ldap auth solution from main?

2015-01-07 Thread Bryan Quigley
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 07.01.2015 12:04, Robie Basak wrote: >> Is sssd use in Ubuntu well enough documented now? Yes, but the official server guide still uses libnss-ldap. Shouldn't be an issue to have it updated for 16.04 though. >> (that was your doingIIRC -

Re: Move old ldap auth solution from main?

2015-01-07 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 07.01.2015 12:04, Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that libnss-ldap was no longer maintained upstream* (and has >> a good amount of bugs) and has good replacements available (sssd, but >> libnss-ldap*d* also works) so I th

Re: Move old ldap auth solution from main?

2015-01-07 Thread Robie Basak
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 02:25:13PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that libnss-ldap was no longer maintained upstream* (and has > a good amount of bugs) and has good replacements available (sssd, but > libnss-ldap*d* also works) so I thought it might be a good candidate > to move o

Move old ldap auth solution from main?

2015-01-06 Thread Bryan Quigley
Hi, I noticed that libnss-ldap was no longer maintained upstream* (and has a good amount of bugs) and has good replacements available (sssd, but libnss-ldap*d* also works) so I thought it might be a good candidate to move out of main in Vivid. In Ubuntu it's also dependent on libpam-ldap, ldap-au