Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-28 Thread Conrad Knauer
Thanks for solving my mysteries! :) CK Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [libgimme] > It's still in the archive because we didn't clean it up yet, it's on my list of things to do Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [OO.o] > mistakenly built with the internal libwps copy

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Matt Zimmerman schrieb: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 02:15:31AM -0600, Conrad Knauer wrote: >> Also, for a little while libwps (very useful for those of us with old >> word processing docs locked away in that format) was a dependency of >> openoffice.org but its not anymore... what changed with that?

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 13:56 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit : > I think he was asking why the package is still in the archive if it's > obsolete, which is a good question. CCing the maintainer. It's still in the archive because we didn't clean it up yet, it's on my list of things to do Cheers,

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-27 Thread Jan Claeys
Op dinsdag 27-03-2007 om 13:56 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Matt Zimmerman: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:40:18AM +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 24.03.2007, 02:15 -0600 schrieb Conrad Knauer: > > > Just out of curiosity, I note in the beta that it tries to find codecs > > > *w

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 02:15:31AM -0600, Conrad Knauer wrote: > Also, for a little while libwps (very useful for those of us with old > word processing docs locked away in that format) was a dependency of > openoffice.org but its not anymore... what changed with that? The changelog doesn't have a

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-27 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:40:18AM +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Samstag, den 24.03.2007, 02:15 -0600 schrieb Conrad Knauer: > > Just out of curiosity, I note in the beta that it tries to find codecs > > *without* libgimme installed... and further that its not the > > dependency of anythin

Re: libgimme and libwps

2007-03-24 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Samstag, den 24.03.2007, 02:15 -0600 schrieb Conrad Knauer: > Just out of curiosity, I note in the beta that it tries to find codecs > *without* libgimme installed... and further that its not the > dependency of anything anymore; what is it still there for? :) gstreamer provides this feature.