On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:32:38PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >But I think it would be more interesting to get a permanent fix for this
> >bug:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/714622
> >This accounts
are wrong.
This single bug accounts for just under half of all importer failures, and
is a failure scenario that the importer *could*, with sufficient smarts,
resolve automatically.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Deb
by
an import failure with no associated bug. Filing a bug against UDD would
seem to be appropriate.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
ting, because I think source branches have a lot of benefit
> over apt-get source by themselves.
They do, but those aren't actually the options I'm picking between. I'm
picking between being able to use lp:ubuntu/$package as the VCS for the
packages I maintain, and having to main
s been discussed in the past, but
somehow never implemented. I don't understand the reasons for that. Is it
because no one who understands the code has time to make the change? Are
people not convinced that such a change is correct?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and
to document
all possible ways that packages can be put together, thus leaving would-be
developers with no guidance about how packages *should* be put together, and
it's my fervent hope that the packaging guide will avoid this trap.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
