Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:24:56PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> The new Ubuntu Packaging Guide is nearing completion but needs your help.
> Browse it at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/
> Articles still to be written include
> -traditional packagin
The new Ubuntu Packaging Guide is nearing completion but needs your help.
Browse it at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/
Articles still to be written include
-traditional packaging
-working with Debian and upstreams
and in the knowledge base section articles needed on python, gnome
On Jul 14, 2011, at 05:26 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>I've been looking over the packaging guide for what needs done to it and
>issues with UDD it reveals.
Thanks very much for your great work on this Jonathan. Daniel asked me to
review your branches, which I did, although one of th
I've been looking over the packaging guide for what needs done to it and issues
with UDD it reveals.
Here's my first merge proposal of various small improvements
https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fixes/+merge/67951
Bugs I found..
810564 merge-upstream fa
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 10:07 -0400, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 9:51:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Just to pick one example, as soon as you want to work on a package with an
> > out of date branch, you need to move from the UDD toolset.
>
> Or quilt. Ugh. If it comes down
on this page for several quilt
>> packages:
>>
>> http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-patchsys.html
>>
>> By no means is it perfect, which everyone acknowledges. Depending on your
>> level of pain tolerance, you don't necess
gt;>quilt with bzr and try to figure out *which* way any particular package is
>>using that combination. I'll stick to apt-get source for those.
>
> I've successfully used the guidelines on this page for several quilt packages:
>
> http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/
age is
>using that combination. I'll stick to apt-get source for those.
I've successfully used the guidelines on this page for several quilt packages:
http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-patchsys.html
By no means is it perfect, which everyone acknowledge
On Jun 03, 2011, at 09:51 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>If you look at http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide you'll
>find no mention of the 'normal' tools and processes that I (and I believe
>most) Ubuntu developers use. This is not really an Ubuntu Packa
On Friday, June 03, 2011 9:51:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Just to pick one example, as soon as you want to work on a package with an
> out of date branch, you need to move from the UDD toolset.
Or quilt. Ugh. If it comes down to quilt, there is no way I'm using UDD until:
- there is a *consist
I just took my first look at the so called Ubuntu Packaging Guide and it's
clear that a lot of work has gone into developing a useful guide for new
contributors. It does concern me that the name "Ubuntu Packaging Guide" is
really misleading.
If you look at http://peopl
11 matches
Mail list logo