they want. If you don't have
to be accepted by MOTU to distribute packages with security, updates,
dependency handling, etc then there's less pressure to get every trivial
package in Universe in the first place.
--
Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:03:24 +0100, Jan Claeys wrote:
Op dinsdag 09-01-2007 om 20:42 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Thomas
Leonard:
I think you'll find the security model is rather different in Zero
Install.
In particular, it should never break a user account, since it only
ever writes
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:15:08 +0100, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
On wo, 2007-01-10 at 18:59 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
In other words, Zero Install isn't a complete security system, but
it's a necessary part of a solution.
imho it's not a solution at all. We work with source and can
long does the process normally
take?
Thanks,
--
Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 21:09:11 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Thomas Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I uploaded a package for Zero Install back in Oct 2006:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=3885
I got a comment on Dec 20th to update the version number, which I've done.
Do I need
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:41:56 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Thomas Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you'll find the security model is rather different in Zero Install.
In particular, it should never break a user account, since it only
ever writes to the directories ~/.config
