On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 06:37 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> > Quite honestly, Linux audio is still pretty messy.
>
> Unfortunately this is true :(. But a lot of this mess is caused by our
> community. 1. Why not working on one sound server that is u
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 06:37 -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> Quite honestly, Linux audio is still pretty messy.
Unfortunately this is true :(. But a lot of this mess is caused by our
community. 1. Why not working on one sound server that is useful for all
tasks instead of working on a new sound server ag
On Tue, July 9, 2013 12:10 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IMO the claim that pulseaudio is crap isn't an opinion, but an objective
> fact. Even if it shouldn't cause issues after disabling it, the way the
> leveling is one (and often not working) is idiotic. IIRC Fons once said
> something similar to
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 01:15 -0400, Mike Holstein wrote:
> i can choose to use JACK only, when i have pulse installed.. thats the
> way i use my production machine.. "pulse is crap" is an opinion..
> there is nothing wrong with pulse, and no reason to remove it to use
> JACK without pulse.. nor is
