Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-10 Thread Ross Gammon
On 02/10/2016 03:31 AM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: > Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building > kdenlive > from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was > a > buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread Ross Gammon
On 02/09/2016 08:01 PM, set wrote: > Just a heads up in this thread. :) > > Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i > missed something? Yes - it is the last high priority one that already has a template on the tracker. > > On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread set
Just a heads up in this thread. :) Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i missed something? On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote: > Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224 I can probably have kdenlive manual test written by friday. Yours, -- Set

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread lukefromdc
Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building kdenlive from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was a buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects, and the upcoming 16.04 kdenlive will have many new features which

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-01-27 Thread set
On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote: I will take care of Hydrogen in the next few days, but I would be grateful if someone would beat me to one of the following: Ardour: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1538219 Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224 Qsynth:

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-01-26 Thread Ross Gammon
Hi All, Thanks to Kev's help in reviewing and merging test cases produced by Bart and Set, and setting up the package tracker, we now have our mandatory test cases published: http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/111025/testcases You will notice that 4 of them, are only

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-17 Thread set
Thank you Ross! On 2015-12-17 08:13, Ross Gammon wrote: > Done - I don't like to hold up such productive people! See link on > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Testing/Testcases > > I only created one bug as I assume they are part of the same source > package. Confirming this is difficult

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-17 Thread set
On 2015-12-17 10:07, set wrote: > Shows up this > is about creating a "manual" on how test the programs, so many other > people can try the same things manually in a program, instead of a robot > testing it automatically, and together make sure the software works as > expected. Just to clarify;

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread set
Hi Ross, Hi List, I'm missing manual-test-cases for: Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor http://photobatch.wikidot.com/ > Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor and for Phatch Image Inspector http://photobatch.wikidot.com/image-inspector > Phatch is designed to support

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread Ross Gammon
On 12/16/2015 09:34 PM, set wrote: > Hi Ross, Hi List, > > I'm missing manual-test-cases for: > > Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor > http://photobatch.wikidot.com/ > >> Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor > > and for > > Phatch Image Inspector >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread WMID
Hi, I spent several hours trying to understand the program but could not, is very complicated, I looked for other options and found XnViewMP which has a comprehensive batch converter. Good idea to make a manual, I hope to see 2015-12-16 15:34 GMT-05:00 set : > Hi Ross, Hi