Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-10 Thread Ross Gammon
On 02/10/2016 03:31 AM, lukefro...@hushmail.com wrote: > Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building > kdenlive > from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was > a > buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread Ross Gammon
On 02/09/2016 08:01 PM, set wrote: > Just a heads up in this thread. :) > > Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i > missed something? Yes - it is the last high priority one that already has a template on the tracker. > > On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread set
Just a heads up in this thread. :) Is kdenlive one the last one that needs to be done for Studio, or have i missed something? On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote: > Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224 I can probably have kdenlive manual test written by friday. Yours, -- Set

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-02-09 Thread lukefromdc
Exactly which version of kdenlive will be in 16.04? I have been building kdenlive from git master routinely, and here's what I've found: the 15.08 release was a buggy mess, 15.12 is very good, both can handle GPU/Movit effects, and the upcoming 16.04 kdenlive will have many new features which

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2016-01-27 Thread set
On 2016-01-26 19:01, Ross Gammon wrote: I will take care of Hydrogen in the next few days, but I would be grateful if someone would beat me to one of the following: Ardour: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1538219 Kdenlive: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538224 Qsynth:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-17 Thread set
Thank you Ross! On 2015-12-17 08:13, Ross Gammon wrote: > Done - I don't like to hold up such productive people! See link on > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Testing/Testcases > > I only created one bug as I assume they are part of the same source > package. Confirming this is difficult

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-17 Thread set
On 2015-12-17 10:07, set wrote: > Shows up this > is about creating a "manual" on how test the programs, so many other > people can try the same things manually in a program, instead of a robot > testing it automatically, and together make sure the software works as > expected. Just to clarify;

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread set
Hi Ross, Hi List, I'm missing manual-test-cases for: Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor http://photobatch.wikidot.com/ > Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor and for Phatch Image Inspector http://photobatch.wikidot.com/image-inspector > Phatch is designed to support

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread Ross Gammon
On 12/16/2015 09:34 PM, set wrote: > Hi Ross, Hi List, > > I'm missing manual-test-cases for: > > Phatch - PHoto bATCH Processor > http://photobatch.wikidot.com/ > >> Phatch is an user friendly, cross-platform Photo Batch Processor > > and for > > Phatch Image Inspector >

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Manual Test Cases

2015-12-16 Thread WMID
Hi, I spent several hours trying to understand the program but could not, is very complicated, I looked for other options and found XnViewMP which has a comprehensive batch converter. Good idea to make a manual, I hope to see 2015-12-16 15:34 GMT-05:00 set : > Hi Ross, Hi