On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> msh blows. "few" doesnt even cover it.
Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
> however, lets forget about the past. Denys has done a lot of wo
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
Some time ago I did a very primitive test with Python on uCLinux for
NIOS. Python did compile and I could type 1+1 and got 2.
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://
There is the original python version of the first torrent client. It might
be usable. The code was pulled a while back but should be out there some
where. If you can't find it, I have it some where and should be able to lay
my hands on it.
Bobby
- Original Message -
From: "Peter
On Monday 27 April 2009 10:52:51 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > msh blows. "few" doesnt even cover it.
>
> Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
> other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 18:28:23 Peter Voslak wrote:
> No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
> webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
> order to get torrentflux running (or any other client).
i havent tried it, but i imagine ctorrent (enhanced)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> being better than something else does make it good ;)
Good enough then? Better than nothing? :)
> if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
> think the answer obvious ...
Well that seems to indica
On Monday 27 April 2009 13:14:11 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
> > think the answer obvious ...
>
> Well that seems to indicate 1.14.0 is released, but that it i
